Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 57 (9189 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Michaeladams
Post Volume: Total: 918,943 Year: 6,200/9,624 Month: 48/240 Week: 63/34 Day: 0/6 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Glenn Morton's Evidence Examined
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 6 of 427 (790961)
09-08-2016 4:44 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Faith
09-08-2016 3:28 PM


I am still, however, very happy that someone agrees with me about old earth dating not being necessary to finding oil.
Finding it isn't the hard part... it is definitely down there. And as long as your looking in a relatively close area, you'll see it.
The hard part is explaining how it got there. You don't get a bunch of dead organism to convert into hydrocarbons in a short amount of time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Faith, posted 09-08-2016 3:28 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 09-08-2016 5:03 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 58 of 427 (791032)
09-09-2016 10:36 AM
Reply to: Message 9 by Faith
09-08-2016 5:03 PM


Finding it has indeed been contested by Old Earthers here, from petrophysics to Pressie and probably edge as well among others.
We're probably talking about different things with the phrase "finding it".
I'm talking about a geologist going something like: "there's all this organic matter way down there that over the course of millions and millions of years has turned into oil and we can drill down there and get it". And then a YEC comes in a goes: "well, really, its that there's all this organic matter way down there that over the course of thousands and thousands of years has turned into oil and we can drill down there and get it".
That they've just lopped a bunch of zeros off of the years wouldn't prevent them from finding the oil. I was going along with this:
quote:
YECs can find oil with just the basic idea of relative dating and knowledge of the morphology of the rocks
I think petrophysics is talking about something different that is more along the lines of if the YECs didn't have the geologists to piggy back off of then they'd have no reason to think the oil was down there and wouldn't go about finding it. That I agree with.
So if you concede it's findable by YEC methods...
I certainly don't concede that because there is no such thing as "YEC methods".
All YECs do is steal other peoples' work and lop zeros off the years.
Unless I'm wrong? Can you tell me about these YEC methods?
Edited by Cat Sci, : typos

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by Faith, posted 09-08-2016 5:03 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024