The Ten Laws of Creationism and Intelligent Design

The Ten laws of Atheism1. First Law of Intellectual Superiority: We are intellectually superior to all non-atheists/agnostics.
2. Second Law of Intellectual Superiority: We are particularly superior intellectually to Christians.
3. Law of Scientific Superiority: Not only are we intellectually superior to believers and Christians in particular, even Nobel Laureates, but we are also light years ahead of all of them in our understanding of science.
4. Law of Moral Superiority: We atheists are good for goodness' sake. Believers do good hoping for personal gain after they die, thinking only of themselves.
5. Law of Piling on: Fifty of us atheists will relentlessly challenge and mock any believer any time, ovewhelming him with our first Four Laws.
6. Law of Changing the Subject: Using our profound intellectual and scientific superiority, we atheists and agnostics will keep moving the ball time and again, as we continue to pile on any believer with ever new challenges.
7. Law of Demanding References: Anything any believer states or claims must be backed up by peer-reviewed studies, with links to all related scientific information.
8. Law of Refuting Your References: Any peer-reviewed reference duly submitted by any believer which is inconsistent with atheist supremacy and scientific truth will be snidely dismissed as something from a church-based, unreliable source.
9. Law of Giggling and Finger-Pointing: By virtue of atheist/agnostic uber-superiority, we have the unchallengeable right to laugh at anything claimed by any believer as preposterous and not worthy of serious consideration.
10. Law of One Less: We only believe in one (1) less god than you, and this is our Supreme Law of Logic because we are repeating the Wise Words of Richard The Wise Dawkins, and if you can't tell us who made god, then you are less than one, or in other words, zero.

10 weird out of place rules that really only show your disdain for atheists and agnostics? No thank you. You have some really weird beliefs pertaining to atheists and agnostics. This is more of a tantrum really and not in tune with atheism or agnosticism at all.I implore you to show me a case where any of these apply in the way that you described them.Let's pick your 7th law for instance, the great part where it says "With links to all related scientific information", please show me an instance where anyone on this forum has ever asked anyone to provide "links to all related scientific information"I'll be waiting, because that doesn't happen.The other ones are pretty silly too, but seeing as this forum is a place about supporting your claims with evidence, that one should be easy. Go on, find me a post from someone asking for "All related scientific information"

False. I know some unintelligent fellow atheists. I don't think there is any difference between the intelligence of an average atheist and an average theist. Having knowledge about biology seems to be a bit hit and miss. When you try to claim that a theory in biology is false while showing a complete lack of knowledge of how proteins are made in cells, what are we to do? Not point out the problems? If a believer is talking about non-science topics I would never ask for peer-reviewed papers as a reference. However, I see nothing wrong with asking for scientific references for scientific claims. Why is this a problem? At times, creationists know so little about the science they are attacking it is like watching a 5 year old child trying to tackle an NFL running back. It does cause a few giggles.