|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Creation | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
quote:Spreading doesn't mean expansion. When you spread butter you have the same volume. Only the shape changes. quote:Same as above. Curtains don't expand. quote:Here you have the earth spreading. Science does not claim that the earth is expanding. An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Phat writes:
Why does that make more sense? How do you go from an unknown quantity like "God" to a sensible conclusion? Wouldn't the conclusion be more sensible if it came from only known quantities, like dirt?
It makes more sense to ask "What came first? God or dirt" rather than to speculate that dirt has eternally existed. Phat writes:
But you're the one who doesn't want to be accountable, aren't you? You want God to do it all for you. Critics say that one major reason that many people prefer the eternal dirt hypothesis is that dirt (matter) does not hold one accountable.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
That was accretion, not expansion. Are you sure the earth did not expand from a small nucleus to what it is today.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
If a new theory is needed, that is not "proof" that the old theory was "false". A lack of those three things means the BB did not take place as has been presented here. Why do you think cavediver made the statement that a new theory was needed.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
But the process is completely different. The earth got larger because new matter was added to it. The expansion of the universe involves a fixed amount of matter/energy.
Whatever you call the process it got bigger. ICANT writes:
You never mentioned it to me. I don't clam up. Every time in the past that I mentioned accretion everybody clamed up.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
You're not saying anything. The fact is that the Bible doesn't say anything about expansion. ringo writes:
That in the beginning was about the size pea. But the process is completely different. The earth got larger because new matter was added to it. The expansion of the universe involves a fixed amount of matter/energy.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
ICANT writes:
You quoted Job, where it says "spread", not stretched. As I've already pointed out, when you spread butter you don't increase the volume. But the Bible does say it was stretched out it doesn't say how. You quoted Isaiah, where it says the heavens were stretched out "like a curtain". When you stretch out a curtain, it doesn't get bigger. Only it's shape changes, like spreading butter. So no, the Bible doesn't say the universe expanded.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
ICANT writes:
Think it through. That's exactly how tents are spread. They go from a small, folded package to a large, flat surface - but the volume of the fabric doesn't change.
Those people had a hard time living in those tents if they were spread like butter on a piece of bread. ICANT writes:
Again, "stretching out" the fabric does not mean that the fabric expanded. To be analogous with the expansion of space, the threads in the fabric would have to get farther apart. You'd have a tent full of holes. For them to live in the tent it had to be expanded it by stretching it out. So no, the Bible does not talk about expansion in the same way that scientists do.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
We're talking about the tent itself, not the volume that it encloses. A tent unfolds to a specific size and doesn't get any bigger. That's the difference between spreading and expansion. What would you have tent dwellers do? Spread the tent on the ground and then put their bedrolls on top of it and lay under the sky? As I said, if a tent was expanding like the universe, the spaces between the threads would get bigger, giving you a tent full of holes. I don't have to go to a sports store to know I wouldn't buy that tent.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
The volume enclosed by the material increases to a certain point and then stops. What science describes is the material itself expanding, and with no particular limit on how much it can expand.
That spread out 10' x 10' tent that is laying on the ground will expand to a volume around 700 cubic feet. ICANT writes:
That's basically what I'm trying to tell you. You should give up the idea that the ancient Hebrews had any hint of an idea about the expanding universe. They had no words for the concept because they didn't have the concept. If you ever decide you want to know what the Hebrew text says you will have to quit thinking the way you do and begin to think like you would if you lived 3000 years ago.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
The universe is not "contained". It is the fabric.
Yes I know that science claims that the universe in contained inside of a fabric of some kind. ICANT writes:
But a tent can not expand forever, so Moses was clearly wrong. The universe is still stretching out in all directions Moses was just talking about a huge tent. Just like cavediver was talking about a huge balloon that could just expand forever.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
Does expansion have anything to do with thermodynamics at all? It's the space that's expanding, not the stuff in it, and only stuff can contain heat. The universe can't expand forever either. It will cease to expand when it reaches a heat death. In any case, it doesn't address what I said. A tent does not expand; it unfolds. Moses had no clue.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
ICANT writes:
But it isn't the same kind of "spreading" as expansion.
You can't unfold or unroll a tent without spreading it out. ICANT writes:
You're misunderstanding those pictures. The "forward direction" is the time axis. The universe is expanding in three dimensions - a sphere, not a circle. The pictures are attempting to show four dimensions in two dimensions. All the pictures I see and descriptions given have the universe beginning at a point and then expanding in a forward direction from that point.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
As I said, it is not expanding in a "forward direction". You're misunderstanding the pictures.
What is the mechanism that would cause the universe to expand in a forward direction. ICANT writes:
That is what the pictures are meant to show. What you see as a "forward direction" is time. Since space is said to have increased between each of the quarks what would be the mechanism that would keep it from expanding into a sphere which is a perfectly round geometrical object?An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 712 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
ICANT writes:
You obviously do misunderstand. There is no "forward direction". Think of the picture as an animation: The initial inflation happens quicky, then expansion continues more slowly - but the universe itself is in the shape of a sphere.
No I am not misunderstanding the pictures. It actually shows the universe expanding in a forward direction. ICANT writes:
That's exactly what it shows.
It does not show the universe expanding in every direction at the same time. ICANT writes:
The universe is expanding as time passes. "Forward direction" is meaningless.
But the universe is not expanding in a time related forward direction. ICANT writes:
It does. You're misunderstanding the picture. It is a sphere expanding in every possible direction simultaneously. Therefore it should look like a sphere.An honest discussion is more of a peer review than a pep rally. My toughest critics here are the people who agree with me. -- ringo
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025