Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 63 (9094 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Post Volume: Total: 901,888 Year: 13,000/6,534 Month: 283/2,210 Week: 224/390 Day: 30/50 Hour: 0/18


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolve to synchronize with the resonance chain of the collective
Larni
Member (Idle past 135 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 34 of 34 (770361)
10-04-2015 9:45 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by natabelas
09-30-2015 11:44 PM


Re: but ...
I dont see star trek, i think that is fiction
What are you talking about? Five separate series, over a dozen films: that is certainly not fiction.
I think you need to be a bit more open minded.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by natabelas, posted 09-30-2015 11:44 PM natabelas has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022