Summations Only

Big Al writes:Well if you can have giant lizards, why not have giant humans.

Big Al writes:Would you release precious data to the globalists? Knowing full well that they will either destroy it, claim that it's a fake, discredit the source, or say it's no big deal?

Big Al writes:The globalists are the people who have all the money and the power (aka the elite). They decide if you get a prize or not, they decide if you get paid or not, they decide if your discovery is worthy or not. Don't you get this?

Big Al writes:So you admit the fossils are genuine? Only the museum is fake but the bones are 100% bona fide.

A stark demonstration of the dramatic changes that have swept through the science of human evolution will be revealed this week at London’s Natural History Museum. A wall of skulls has been built at the entrance of its new human evolution gallery, graphically showing how our understanding of our seven-million-year journey from ancient apeman ancestors to Homo sapiens has been transformed in recent years.In just over a decade an unprecedented number of new species have been uncovered by palaeontologists, from the Hobbit man of Flores to the Denisovan cavemen of Siberia. Most will be displayed on the wall of skulls.

Big Al writes:I'm not sure what the globalists like or don't like.

You begrudgingly accepted the elongated skull but only on the basis that it is deformed.

Maybe because it suggests devolution rather than evolution.

And if the globalists are doing such a terrible job why can't I get you guys to believe in giants?

Undeformed Peruvian crania appear to have a craniofacial architecture that is distinct from the corresponding shapes seen in the Japanese and Inuit. They are characterized by anteriorly protrud- ing faces and a relatively flat angle between the foramen magnum and the basioccipital, which leads to a more vertically oriented foramen magnum axis. In this sense, they are somewhat flatter. When exposed to circumferential deformation, this pattern becomes globally reinforced with respect to at least the face. In addition, the face then also protrudes inferiorly, nasion protrudes anteriorly, whereas the foramen magnum axis continues to become more horizontal in its orientation. Therefore, our results are generally consistent with previously published data (Anto ́n, 1989b; Kohn et al., 1993), but do not agree in some important aspects. Notably, we find the effects of artificial deformation on the basioccip- ital to be less than previously observed, whereas the effects on the face observed here are similar to other studies or even more important. Given that statisti- cal discrimination is not as good when facial fea- tures are not taken into account, we conclude that the effects of artificial deformation on the face out- weigh those observed on the basioccipital portion. Generally, these effects seem to emphasize morpho- logical trends that already exist in populations that practiced intentional deformation.

BJ writes:Wadlow is at least 10-12 standard deviations from the mean. That's a pretty unheard-of outlier.

My point is that it isn't completely inconceivable that some type of 'giant' existed at one time in the Earth.

The biblical giants, like Goliath and Og, where usually described as fitting within the 9-12-foot range, which, while beyond anything we've ever observed, are not beyond the reach of honest mistake or 'fish story' exaggeration. The worth1000 and other such internet-meme giant photos are clearly stupid.

Big Al writes:See, you guys are as just as capable of using google as I am.