|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Evolution. We Have The Fossils. We Win. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
You have the fossils?
Do you have the fossils of giant human beings that have been found all over the earth? Did we shrink?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Theodoric writes: No one has them. They don't exist. So the images of giant bones I see on the internet (which look convincing) are all fake?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
AZPaul3 writes: I know some weird people who mistake, maybe willingly, dinosaur bones as giant human bones for religious reasons. Well if you can have giant lizards, why not have giant humans.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Claim: The skeleton of a giant human was uncovered during gas exploration in Saudi Arabia. Well the giants would satisfactorily explain the megalithic construction at Cusco in Peru; the site known as the Sacsayhauman, huge rocks carved out perfectly, earthquake resistant and defying even modern day masonry. A human of the size in the photo however, would make short work of it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Dr Adequate writes: No. Nor does anyone else. 'Cos they don't exist. If I said elongated skulls have been found would you say that those don't exist too? Anyway here is a link -->Initial DNA analysis of Paracas elongated skull released — with incredible results | Ancient Origins
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Percy writes: Of course elongated skulls exist. It's called head binding. Some cultures, for their own reasons, obviously thought it was appealing. You obviously didn't bother to even look at my link. It clearly rules out head binding as the cause due to the cranial joins being in unusual places.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
AZPaul writes: How would anyone know this? The data is not being released. Any independent finding contrary to the BS presented would put a big dent in the tour business. Can't have that. And yet Richard Dawkins wants me to visit his museums instead, to prove to myself that his version of events is the correct one. Can't you see the double standards?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Percy writes: Sure I did. Congratulations on believing just about anything you read, I guess.So if an article can't even accurately report things as simple as volume and weight, are you really going to believe them Well based on your logic I shouldn't believe you because if you can't even accurately read my links before banging on about head binding, then why would I listen to you?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
AZPaul writes: How would anyone know this? The data is not being released. Would you release precious data to the globalists? Knowing full well that they will either destroy it, claim that it's a fake, discredit the source, or say it's no big deal?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Tangle writes: There isn't a scientist on earth that wouldn't give an arm to be the first to scientifically find a new species of human. They'd be famous forevever. Don't you get this? It's the exact opposite of a conspiracy theory cover-up. Scientists absolutely love finding new stuff and proving old stuff wrong - they get prizes for it. The globalists are the people who have all the money and the power (aka the elite). They decide if you get a prize or not, they decide if you get paid or not, they decide if your discovery is worthy or not. Don't you get this?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Tangle writes: But not covering them up well enough to stop them appearing in fake museums run by travel agents? So you admit the fossils are genuine? Only the museum is fake but the bones are 100% bona fide.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Tangle writes: These 'globalists' of yours are doing a really terrible job of preventing these discoveries. Is it just giants they don't like? I'm not sure what the globalists like or don't like. But I can see on these forums that you guys didn't take kindly to the giant fossils. You begrudgingly accepted the elongated skull but only on the basis that it is deformed. So maybe it's you guys that don't like giants. Maybe because it suggests devolution rather than evolution. And if the globalists are doing such a terrible job why can't I get you guys to believe in giants?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Tangle writes: I haven't accepted anything - I know nothing about them and neither does science or you That's right you haven't accepted anything. Infact none of you guys have. You operate like a collective. Are you and your forum buddies just one massive entity? You all share the same views and opinions? What kind of group think is this? You do know the globalists are masters of mind-control?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
Dr Adequate writes: Yes, why else do we all think that two plus two is four Ahhh but I can prove that 2=1. Let me show you - if a=b=1then a=b; therefore a^2=ab; therefore a^2-b^2=ab-b^2 therefore (a+b)(a-b)=b(a-b) Now if we remove a-b from both sides we get a+b=b ie proof that 2=1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Big_Al35 Member (Idle past 1095 days) Posts: 389 Joined: |
NosyNed writes: and dividing by zero is prohibited because it produces stupid results like that one Now what if I hadn't told you that a=b=1 but left all the rest of the calculation. That's algebra for you.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2025