Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9101 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: sensei
Upcoming Birthdays: AlexCaledin
Post Volume: Total: 904,086 Year: 967/14,231 Month: 967/1,514 Week: 0/234 Day: 0/36 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   PZ Myers vs. Adaptationism
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 12 of 49 (763213)
07-22-2015 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by MrHambre
07-22-2015 10:34 AM


Re: Spandrels and Storytelling
How does Dawkins know natural selection is the only explanation for the phenomena he described?
Because they look designed. The stuff that results from things like genetic drift doesn't look designed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by MrHambre, posted 07-22-2015 10:34 AM MrHambre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by MrHambre, posted 07-24-2015 3:28 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 34 of 49 (765373)
07-28-2015 10:46 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by MrHambre
07-24-2015 3:28 PM


Re: Design Flaws
How would drift, sans selection, yield a phenotypic feature that looks designed?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by MrHambre, posted 07-24-2015 3:28 PM MrHambre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by MrHambre, posted 07-28-2015 1:39 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 36 of 49 (765401)
07-28-2015 3:35 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by MrHambre
07-28-2015 1:39 PM


Re: Design Flaws
I can't make any connection between the things that you are complaining about biologists doing, and the things that biologists are actually doing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by MrHambre, posted 07-28-2015 1:39 PM MrHambre has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023