There is no evolution or creationism - this is the new Matrix/DNA world view

Which part of your "theory" is tangible enough to land a probe on an asteroid?

Specifically, how would your formula handle that problem? How would it differ from the mundane Newtonian mechanics with relativistic overtones?

No, a fundamental lesson that YOU don't seem to have learned is that Physics and Math are pretty good at solving real-world problems, like landing a probe on an asteroid. You need to show how your system could solve that problem AS WELL as Physics and Math do. Then you can move ahead to show how your system is "better".

What's the difference? What's the point of a lot of woo-woo "ideas" if they don't have any effect on the real world?

We understand the "system" well enough to know that pouring more CO₂ into the atmosphere is making it worse; therefore, pouring less CO₂ into the atmosphere will make it less worse. SPECIFICALLY, how do you propose to improve on that situation by "understanding the system" better?

Woo.

You don't need to "add new information". You just need to change the existing information.

The fact that there IS a correction mechanism shows that the operation of DNA is not perfect - i.e. the correction mechanism doesn't always work either.

I have a photo of myself beside a car with the Manhattan skyline in the background. I have another photo of myself beside the same car with the St. Louis Gateway Arch in the background. I have another photo of myself beside the same car with the Golden Gate Bridge in the background.You're saying that I have absolutely no evidence that I drove from Atlantic to Pacific.

Certainly, you could have all kinds of alternative hypotheses - but you would need evidence to back them up. What the available evidence actually shows is that I drove. The evidence may not point to an "absolutely correct" conclusion but you are wrong to suggest that the evidence doesn't point to that conclusion.