Before I waste my time replying are you serious about those pictures of monkeys??? please tell me if that is displayed as a fact somewhere because that joke has to make news. Oh wait. I forgot the news are owned by corporations that finance technological and scientific institutes so i better don't say anything. But please tell me if your serious about those pictures.
Now I've mentioned how cognitive dissonance deals with conflicting information by calling people brainwashed or part of a conspiracy ... and here you are adding conspiracy to the mix.
... The only muppets here are those trying to put together a monkey skeleton with shoulders and arms out of place to make it look somewhat similar to a human skeleton next to it. ...
These are emotional responses on your part to not being able to deal with the real world and, in this case, the actual evidence for evolution.
... The missing link is just hilarious. Tell me where he lives and where does he works ...
Again you display a rather dismally under-informed concept of how evolution works that is just laughable. Again if this is what somebody taught you then they lied. AND again you can find remedial education at:
... A change so big, so radical, as we have between the two cretures would take millions of years. ...
Between 8 and 10 million years according to the evidence.
Exactly and evidence is what science does not have to support that ridiculous theory. ...
Fossil and genetic. Why do these completely different avenues of evidence provide the same answer?
... We don't even have the same chromosomes. We have 46, they have 48. Where is the transition ...
This has been answered, you mocked it (an emotional response) rather than provided information that the answer was invalid (which would be a scientific response).
We can also compare DNA with Neanderthals and with gorillas and see similar differences in different degrees ... as would be expected from evolution.
Our last common ancestor, DOES show an evolutionary line with its previous ancestors. But between that one and us, is not an evolution.
Again, define evolution, the process and the theory.
Fossils are like snapshots of the past, and like snapshots of a trip across America they do not tell the complete story. Evolution does not occur in leaps and bounds but slowly generation by generation, just as step by step you can walk across the US. The pictures are not the story, they are evidence that the evolutionary events occurred.
Why you tilt his head forward? let it rest on its original position and overlap a modern homo sapiens. Then try to explain how in the world you come from that monkey to a modern human in one generation.
As has been pointed out this demonstrates your absolute ignorance of how evolution works. I've asked you to define the process of evolution and the theory of evolution, and you have evaded that and ignored it ... because you do not know what evolution is.
I've given you links to information so that you can correct your ignorance, which apparently, you have ignored as well.
You think millions of years of evolution occurred in one generation.
You don't know what evolution is, but you are convinced that it didn't happen.
You are so ignorant of evolution that you have no clue how ignorant you are on evolution.
I know you're just trying to justify your work with those long posts but in reality you are not proving absolutely anything. You are just running in circles with the same fictional ideas that have been running around for decades. ...
Thank you for demonstrating your absolute lack of any proper actual intellectual attempt to provide actual factual objective empirical evidence that would substantiate a single one of your claims.
You have already demonstrated your abysmal ignorance of how evolution actually works.
All you have left in your quiver is empty pot-shots.
... You are worried (emotion) about the sustainability of the theory which is more senseless by the day.
Curiously I am not worried in the slightest about the viability of an extremely well tested and validated theory ... certainly you have provided no challenge to it.
Theories are not invalidated by the wishful thinking of ignorant people, they are invalidated by evidence that they fail tests based on predictions that the theories make.
You should sue the people that misinformed you so completely that all you can do is make a bigger fool of yourself than you have already done.
The only emotion I feel is a faint sadness that a brain can be so wasted and misused, and willfully stay undereducated, choosing to maintain ignorance.
Science isn't challenged by opinion, it is challenged by evidence.