Could asteroids lead to the extinction of YECism ?

Somehow Faith still doesn't know that science doesn't work on 'proof', but on scientific evidence...where's Faith been the last 300 years?Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

Not when the person's ignorance is as well-established as yours. Your ignorance is a fact that must be taken into account when evaluating your fantasies. True, but you got it the old-fashioned way. You earned it by years of blithering. And enthusiastic participation in insulting others.

Nope.Don't fool yourself.I'll start.Theespruit Formatian. Komati Formation. Hooggenoeg Formation. Kromberg Formation. Onverwacht Group. Empangeni Suite. Commondale Formation. De Kraalen Formation. Assegai Formation. Dwalile Formation. Nondweni Group. Kraaipan Group. Bandelierkop Formation. Beit Bridge Formation. Ngawane Gr. Steynsdorp Pl. Tsawela Gr. Vlakplaats Gd. Doornhoek Tr. Stolzburg Gn. Theespruit Pl. First Barberton Mountain Land metamorphism.We've got plenty.Any arguments left?

Faith knows your little word games and that there's nothing wrong with the word "proof" as I use it.

If those are angular conformities I'd explain them the same way I explain Siccar Point. But just making an incomprehensible list of names isn't an argument.

He-he-heIncomprohensible? The gold mining companies operating in my country sure don't find those those names incomprehensible at all.Any comment about those 'incomprehensible names' yet?Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

So I guess that on the rest you haven't done the research and don't intend to. Not even your "experiment". And you certainly haven't considered the forces involved, which your "explanation" supposedly relies on.

Sure is in science.Whether you like it or not. You can't change facts.You're allowed to have your own opinions; not your own facts.

These are not just names. They're rocks. Rocks Geologists named. Tens of thousands of geologists. Tens of thousand of different rock 'kinds'.For very, very good reasons. They studied those rocks. Nothing incomprehensible it at all. All published in peer-reviewed geological journals. Not in religious propaganda on the internet.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

What are you going on about? Siccar Point is off topic in this thread, I've discussed it at length elsewhere and already got too far into it here. You are raising your endless questions and I'm not interested in pursuing them here. As I said, I've discussed this to death elsewhere. If you want to continue with your endless questions and demands and accusations please move it to one of the threads where we've already discussed it to death.

I'm glad to hear it. I wouldn't like to think they didn't have good reasons.And to you too: This is off topic here. Maybe you and PaulK could combine your efforts and take it somewhere else.Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

Fine, you've got nothing. Not even an interest in the truth.

Maybe if you could just try to start studying the basics of geology, then you could stop being seen as just another fruit loop when commenting on geology?Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.Edited by Pressie, : No reason given.

OK, You've got nothing, not even a real interest in the truth. And Siccar Point and other angular unconformities stand as real evidence of the antiquity of the Earth.

She's explicitly stated that she has no interest in learning anything about geology. Fantasy suits her fine.Of course she also explicitly stated that she knew most of what Dr. A posted in his intro to geology thread. She likes to lie, too.