Ancient Biblical ritual saves MILLIONS of lives

You've got to be kidding!???
You're citing Velikovsky as a source, and you expect someone to accord you (or him) any credibility?

Oh really? You know, that's funny because the wikipedia article on the history of the Jews in Egypt makes no mention of them being rulers. They were immigrants to that area forming part of the original trade economy.

You want to cite me a source that isn't some vague blogpost from a crackpot?

Eliyahu writes:And you think that when Wikipedia doesn't mention something, then it doesn't exist??

Velikovsky's ideas have been almost entirely rejected by mainstream academia (often vociferously so) and his work is generally regarded as erroneous in all its detailed conclusions. Moreover, scholars view his unorthodox methodology (for example, using comparative mythology to derive scenarios in celestial mechanics) as an unacceptable way to arrive at conclusions.The late Stephen Jay Gould[33] offered a synopsis of the mainstream response to Velikovsky, writing, "Velikovsky is neither crank nor charlatanalthough, to state my opinion and to quote one of my colleagues, he is at least gloriously wrong... Velikovsky would rebuild the science of celestial mechanics to save the literal accuracy of ancient legends."

Velikovsky's revised chronology has been rejected by nearly all mainstream historians and Egyptologists. It was claimed, starting with early reviewers, that Velikovsky's usage of material for proof is often very selective.[40][41][42] In 1965 the leading cuneiformist Abraham Sachs, in a forum at Brown University, discredited Velikovsky's use of Mesopotamian cuneiform sources.[43] Velikovsky was never able to refute Sachs' attack.[44] In 1978, following the much-postponed publication of further volumes in Velikovsky's Ages in Chaos series, the United Kingdom-based Society for Interdisciplinary Studies organised a conference in Glasgow specifically to debate the revised chronology.[45] The ultimate conclusion of this work, by scholars including Peter James, John Bimson, Geoffrey Gammonn, and David Rohl, was that the Revised Chronology was untenable.[46]

Eliyahu writes:Velikovsky was a genius who made Albert Einstein pale in comparison.

are so strong that a blind man can see he is right

Velikovsky was a genius who made Albert Einstein pale in comparison.

Velikovsky was a genius who made Albert Einstein pale in comparison.History is a very soft science. Well, let's face it, it is not a science at all.It is based on assumptions and unproven theories.And the proofs Velikovsky brings in his book "Ages in Chaos" are so strong that a blind man can see he is right.Just read the book and your eyes will be opened.

Did you read the book? Or are you just ranting about something you know nothing about?