Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,843 Year: 4,100/9,624 Month: 971/974 Week: 298/286 Day: 19/40 Hour: 0/3


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   SCIENCE: -- "observational science" vs "historical science" vs ... science.
xongsmith
Member
Posts: 2587
From: massachusetts US
Joined: 01-01-2009
Member Rating: 6.4

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 180 of 614 (731924)
07-01-2014 5:56 PM 		Reply to: Message 172 by Faith
07-01-2014 3:41 PM

Re: Awomen!
Faith writes:
​
Well there you have it: scientists are always right, can't ever be wrong about anything, even when the method is merely interpretive and historical.
​
Well this is wrong, isn't it?
​
Here's a better way to word it:
Scientists are always closest to being right.
- xongsmith, 5.7d
This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by Faith, posted 07-01-2014 3:41 PM Faith has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by Faith, posted 07-01-2014 7:03 PM xongsmith has seen this message but not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024