Faith writes:
If the scientific conclusion contradicts the Bible, we assume the fault is in the science.
This means there is no point in arguing with you. Your loss, I'm afraid.
Anyway, instead of bringing up counter-evidence against your worldview, let me try and think along the same lines, and see what we get.
If we examine a fossil, let's say the fossil remains of a stegosaur, we find that it is made of stone. It may look like the bones of a stegosaur, but it is really nothing more than a collection of fancy stones. How can that be?
Well, the obvious conclusion is that it really
is a lookalike of a stegosaur and that it was made by a sculptor. After all, it's made of stone, not bone. It's a statue, it's art. And the sculptor either had a very vivid imagination, or was high on some hallucinogenic substance, because what he made is the stuff of dreams, obviously.
Your elaborate theory of a Flood that killed outrageous looking animals is way too complicated an explanation for what really went on long ago. Noah didn't build a boat, he sculpted a theme park.
It's obvious.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science." - Charles Darwin.