|
Author
|
Topic: Is there a legitimate argument for design?
|
FLRW
Member (Idle past 498 days) Posts: 73 Joined: 10-08-2007
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
Message 322 of 638 (733223)
07-15-2014 11:09 AM
|
|
|
I say there is not a legitimate argument for design. 3% of humans are born with a major defect. Toyota has a better QC program than this.
|
FLRW
Member (Idle past 498 days) Posts: 73 Joined: 10-08-2007
|
|
|
Message 325 of 638 (733449)
07-17-2014 11:14 AM
|
|
|
What would be the feature of a six legged human baby?
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 329 by ringo, posted 07-17-2014 12:44 PM | | FLRW has not replied |
|
FLRW
Member (Idle past 498 days) Posts: 73 Joined: 10-08-2007
|
|
|
Message 326 of 638 (733451)
07-17-2014 11:22 AM
|
|
|
I suppose you could say that an intelligent designer wanted to create trees but animals and humans were the result of his creation errors.
|
FLRW
Member (Idle past 498 days) Posts: 73 Joined: 10-08-2007
|
|
|
Message 327 of 638 (733452)
07-17-2014 11:28 AM
|
|
|
No CS, but I say .0001% would be .
|
FLRW
Member (Idle past 498 days) Posts: 73 Joined: 10-08-2007
|
|
|
Message 330 of 638 (733468)
07-17-2014 1:00 PM
|
|
|
zr, recently in the news there was a story about a baby born with 6 legs. CS, what do you think is an acceptable error for the design of humans?
|
FLRW
Member (Idle past 498 days) Posts: 73 Joined: 10-08-2007
|
|
|
Message 332 of 638 (733471)
07-17-2014 1:29 PM
|
|
|
Being a moral person, I would say it is 0. Why would you design a human with any error? Haven't we just proven that humans are not a product of intelligent design? Or have we proven that humans are the product of imperfect design?
|
FLRW
Member (Idle past 498 days) Posts: 73 Joined: 10-08-2007
|
CS, thanks and I agree with you.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 334 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-17-2014 2:08 PM | | New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2