Yes, I thought I was clear that I'm objecting to that definition
But we are talking about science and using science terms, not The Utterly Ridiculous Dictionary according to Faith. You don't get to come up with your own definitions.
I haven't called scientists liiars and deceivers.
No just deluded and dishonest.
I spent thirty years believing in evolution and made some attempts to verify it, all of which left me with the sense that the supposed evidence really didn't support what it claimed to support.
You cannot even use the word Theory correctly, how would you know evidence if you saw it. Do you not believe in germ theory because you cannot see germs? How about the Theory of Gravity? Do you think it is backed by evidence?
Of course IF you could SHOW me via your time machine that it actually happened I'd have no choice but to change my beliefs again
So forensic evidence is bunk? People should only be convicted of things that there is a recording of them committing the crime?
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.