Ruling out an expanding universe with conventional proofs

A bachelor's degree doesn't make anyone an '-ist'.

I looked through the viXra website where you currently have your paper hosted. I browsed through some papers in a subject I'm familiar withlinguisticsand found little there worth my while.What do you think of the quality of the typical submissions to that website? Do you think that might impact how people view your work?

I think it means that few if any serious people with the required background and knowledge have even read your paper.Which is why you've been told several times that this isn't a good place to get a critical review of your research. There are few members here with the relevant background required for such a critique. The same goes for YouTube.Jon

He's lazy. He is smart. He has good ideas. But he's lazy.I can completely understand.

He reminds me of myself.

We can only go on what he's told us and on how he's acted.And so far he has told us he is smart and acted like he's lazy.

Or more.Why do you want to introduce your theory, invalidate the old one, prove yours, and strike down any possible objections all in one go?Such tactics are overwhelmingly the standard of quacks, cranks, and pseudo-scientists.