Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 0/13 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Ruling out an expanding universe with conventional proofs
jasonlang
Member (Idle past 3403 days)
Posts: 51
From: Australia
Joined: 07-14-2005


Message 129 of 223 (702737)
07-11-2013 7:42 AM
Reply to: Message 95 by Percy
07-06-2013 7:04 AM


Re: Call for CaveDiver or Son Goku
(EDIT: A response to post #96 not #95, I don't post here often and assumed the reply link was at the top of each post, not the bottom)
Quote from AlphaBob:
quote:
I would say that someone has a typo in their article .
There's nothing wrong with the pre-1992 articles; for example, some contain irrefutable observations such as spectroscopic redshift of the FBGs and their characteristics. The problem is that many have purposed theoretical solutions that can be ruled out from later observations.
Mergers between galaxies for example were not fully constrained until just recently (2011+), which is an important aspect in the FBG problem. Some suggested that drastic mergers took place around 0.3z - 1.0z, but new results demonstrate the amount of mergers is insignificant. Others purposed that the FBGs were blue dwarfs or dE, but 300% brighter than the local populations. Observations have shown that they perfectly match the characteristics of common irregulars and disk, i.e. they are fully consistent with no evolution in terms of color and redshift distribution.
  —alphaBob
"purposed"? Surely you mean "proposed"? Does your voice activation thing misunderstand you? I would have thought those two words were pronounced rather differently.
Edited by jasonlang, : No reason given.
Edited by jasonlang, : No reason given.
Edited by jasonlang, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 95 by Percy, posted 07-06-2013 7:04 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 132 by Alphabob, posted 07-11-2013 12:59 PM jasonlang has not replied

  
jasonlang
Member (Idle past 3403 days)
Posts: 51
From: Australia
Joined: 07-14-2005


(1)
Message 130 of 223 (702738)
07-11-2013 8:00 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by Alphabob
07-07-2013 1:10 AM


Re: Call for CaveDiver or Son Goku
quote:
I suppose that demonstrates the current state of science when a noble laureate is considered a crank. Arxiv has admitted censorship by itself "'to accommodate the interests of people within the research community' and not 'outsiders'"; keyword interest.
"He is now a crank like you"
Once again a baseless accusation. You argue in circles and ignore basic proofs and logic. The proofs are simple, the discussion already exists from conventional literature and all you can do is repeat the same crank line over and over again. Please contribute something productive or nothing at all...
Dude, that Nobel Laureate now specializes in telepathy studies. Regardless of what he may have done before, his current work is pure crank. That's logic. A Nobel prize isn't a blank cheque for everything you do after that to be considered utterly brilliant by some sort of fiat.
Edited by jasonlang, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Alphabob, posted 07-07-2013 1:10 AM Alphabob has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024