Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 2/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Is It Science? ⇒

Belief in God is scientific.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Belief in God is scientific.
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display

(1)
Message 99 of 262 (695276)
04-04-2013 9:47 AM 		Reply to: Message 45 by divermike1974
04-03-2013 4:18 PM

Re: Your brain gets too much wrong
If it cant be observed it isn't known, therefore not in the known universe.
​
That's good to know. When was the last time a god was observed scientifically?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by divermike1974, posted 04-03-2013 4:18 PM divermike1974 has not replied
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 133 of 262 (695438)
04-05-2013 10:39 AM 		Reply to: Message 101 by Stile
04-04-2013 11:50 AM

Re: Programming for your Brain
How do you program your brain?
​
Cognitive Restructuring.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by Stile, posted 04-04-2013 11:50 AM Stile has seen this message but not replied
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display

(2)
Message 148 of 262 (695503)
04-06-2013 5:25 AM 		Reply to: Message 134 by Ossat
04-05-2013 10:42 AM

Re: Abiogenesis is not the theory of evolution
Not at all true.
​
If a god magicked the world and life into a starting state it could then evolve.
​
So evolution does not depend on abiogenesis. This is an entry level concept.
​
To reiterate: evolution can work from naturalistic abiogenesis or from divine abiogenesis.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by Ossat, posted 04-05-2013 10:42 AM Ossat has not replied
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 167 of 262 (695602)
04-08-2013 7:56 AM 		Reply to: Message 162 by divermike1974
04-08-2013 6:10 AM

It's the same for people, too.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 162 by divermike1974, posted 04-08-2013 6:10 AM divermike1974 has not replied
  
Larni
Member (Idle past 185 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 259 of 262 (745700)
12-26-2014 9:08 AM 		Reply to: Message 257 by kishan
12-26-2014 3:45 AM

Incorrect.
​
Science makes no statements about God.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 257 by kishan, posted 12-26-2014 3:45 AM kishan has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024