|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Who Made God? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
It was catholic in the sense of inclusive just as in the "I believes" (AkA Apostles Creed); the Holy Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic Church is a later creation that claims through Apostolic Succession a connection to the early Christian Church.
But that is a claim that is valid when speaking of ANY of the Apostolic Succession Churches including Henry's creation and all of it's chapters. Nicea was primarily a gathering to kick some factions out of the mainstream Christian communion, and the Nicean Creed was primarily designed as a political touchstone much like the KJV was designed as a political tool to try to tone down the Anti-Roman Catholic segments of the society and to establish the Divine Right of Kings to rule. Edited by jar, : see explanation of the "I believes"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: You basically argue that God is a product of human imagination, consensus, and mythos...whereas Faith and I would argue that God exists perfectly and impartially independent of human input. Yet again you are simply misrepresenting what I have said. You really need to stop doing that. I point out that all of the evidence shows that every God described has been the product of a human mind. It's not something I argue, it is simply reporting the facts supported by evidence. The God of Genesis 1 is described as an entirely different character than the God in Genesis 2 & 3. Sorry but that is a fact. Ganesha is different than Shiva or Indra or Vishnu. Jupiter is different than Venus. Ra is different than Seth. Odin is different than Loki. Raven is different than Coyote. That is an observation based on evidence that can be verified by anyone. In each case what is being created is a God as desired by the author. I fear that seems to bother you but don't see anyway to put it that could be honest yet make you happy.
Phat writes: I doubt whether many of those Bishops and officials walked in the Spirit on a regular basis....but then again, you will ask what this even means. Why do you think those gathered at Nicea 1 were any different than any gathering of prelates today? Does it matter whether is is a College of Cardinals or the First President and the Twelve or the General Conference or the Chapter of Monks?
Phat writes: I believe that Sproul was not simply some conman. He had a genuine love of scripture and of logic, reason, and reality but where you differ is that you are unafraid to throw God and the Holy Spirit away and just go with your reason. Again, that is simply misrepresenting my position. You really need to stop doing that. Have you and I discussed Logic, Reason AND Reality? Have you ever heard me ask "What does the evidence show?"
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: Yes, it does. The believers gathered in the Upper Room in Acts were not simply a hodgepodge group with individual beliefs. They all walked in the Spirit. Sorry Phat but that still has no meaning whatsoever. First, there are several references to "the upper room" in Acts. So which instance? The one where Matthias was chosen and Justus rejected?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Perhaps surprisingly my 9th. grade English teacher at St. Paul's. It was another one of those small opuses they seemed to love assigning. He was also the one that turned several of us on to films like Orfeu Negro, Never on Sunday and Wild Strawberries.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
We tend to forget that most Christian Holy Days are simply co-opted Holy Days that were common in other religions. Even our major Holy Days like Easter and Pentecost were just repurposed Jewish Holidays.
Here is part of an adult Sunday School Class I once taught:
quote: Christianity has always adopted and repurposed most any feast or party or celebration it found in any other religion. You do not gain converts by taking away existing festivals. Christmas, Easter, Pentecost are all examples of Christianity adopting, renaming and redefining existing celebrations and framing them in a Christian mythos just as the Jewish Holidays of Passover, Shavuot and Sukkoth are repurposed harvest festivals framed in a Jewish mythos.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Yet the fact remains, that is exactly what is written in the Nicene Creed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Dredge writes: So why do bother with what you call Christianity, if it’s all a fabrication of the human mind? While all that is in the Bible is of course the product and creation of human minds, that does not make it all a fabrication. As I have said, I am a Christian because I was raised in a Christian home, became a member of a recognized Christian Church, was educated in a Christian School and find many of the teachings, the gospel of Jesus a reasonable and practical way to live.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Yet the fact remains I am not interpreting anything but rather simply pointing out what is actually written in EVERY version of the Nicene Creed since 325CE.
It's also a fact the the Bible is filled with contradicts and mutually exclusive accounts of what is said to have happened. Edited by jar, : appalin spallin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Dredge writes: Well, in terms of the Bible, my idea of a fabrication is something that doesn’t come from God, but from humans. So if the entire Bible is a product of human minds, then the entire Bible is a fabrication. Nevertheless, I’m interested in which parts of the Bible you consider to be not a fabrication. None of the Bible comes from God unless the God is intentionally supplying false and misleading information. There is no other explanation possible since there are numerous examples of stories that evolve as they are retold and also examples of direct mutually exclusive accounts of supposedly the same event. Over the years I've covered many such examples here. Two clear examples are from the New Testament; the evolution of the Great Commission and the encounter of Saul on the road to Damascus. Additional evidence that the Bible is a creation of humans is the fact that there is no such thing as "The Bible" but rather a whole set of canons ranging from the smallest that contains only the first five books and none of the New Testament to the largest that contains over 80 books. But the stories in the Bible record the political, economic and religious mythos of each era. It is an anthology of anthologies. They are not fabrications even though written by humans. They are often examples of the conflicts and schisms that existed almost from the beginning between different competing versions of Judaism and later the fledgling Jews sect called Christianity.
Dredge writes: So you’re Christian on the outside, but not on the inside. In other words, like I said, you’re a fake Christian./////////// Do you believe in life after death? Yes, I do believe there is a life after death (yet another reason it is essential that Jesus was only human while living on Earth) but also understand that believe is unreasonable, irrational and illogical. It's also impossible to test and there is absolutely no evidence to support that belief. But if there is a Heaven I am very sure Christians will be a very small minority there and that there will be far more atheist, agnostics, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims, Jews. Taoists as well as followers of Confucius and Mencius in attendance.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Dredge writes: News flash!! God’s official organisation on earth - the Catholic Church - defined exactly what the Bible contains about 1500 years ago. Yet the fact remains that the Roman Catholic Canon is but one of many Canons. And the fact remains that I AM a Christian and so have no anti-Christian Phobia.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
My pleasure.
Yet the fact remains I am a Christian, Jesus was not a Christian and the Nicene Creed says what it says. AbE: Also I do not take things out of context like so many "Biblical Christians" seem to do. Why not quote the whole post?
quote: Edited by jar, : see AbE:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: I might ask what it is about you that makes you so honest...? That's just silly Phat, what does honesty have to do with my pointing out what is actually written in the Bible Stories?
Phat writes: So it seems that when you (and to a similar degree ringo) "teach" scripture, you have it describe a different "God" than the mainstream apologists do. I don't "teach" scripture. I don't "interpret" scripture. The snake oil salesmen do those things. I simply point out what was actually written and don't deny that there are contradictions, absurdities, evolving folk tales as well as lots of mythos and ethics.
Phat writes: Dare I say that you are at odds with the global majority of those who call themselves Christians. No shit Little Beaver. Jesus was at odds with the gobal majority of those who called themselves Jews. But what is actually written rather than what do the apologist market?
Phat writes: And if so, how do we know that what you are selling (Personal Responsibility and secular humanistic do-goodedness) is the right product to be pushing? Again Phat I am not selling anything. I am simply pointing out what is actually written in the Bible and the Creeds and the Canons. The story of Joseph is a great example and it's from Genesis, the very beginnings of the Bible. Who filled the granaries? Who grew the food? Who preserved the meats? Who built the graneries themselves?
Phat writes: Point blank question: Was Jesus God? We've been over that before Phat, many times. If Jesus was more than simply human while living here on Earth then the whole play is simply a worthless farce and conjob.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Phat writes: You are attempting to market an idea and ideology. Freedom of speech allows this, thank God. I get a little terse with you because you frame your arguments with personal jibes such as "Learn To Read" and "Have You Ever Read The Bible"? Yet those are still unanswered questions. I simply point out what the Bible actually says or what is actually written in the Creeds or ask what the actual evidence shows. In each case it is not anything I am marketing; it is simply what the Bible actually says, what is actually written in the Creeds, what the evidence actually shows. There is no idea or ideology involved. I am marketing nothing. I am telling you to read the label instead of just believing me. Look at what is on the ingredients list.
Phat writes: But I wont let you get away with the argument that you are not selling anything. You are engaged in a full-on attack on Biblical Christianity. That's silly Phat. If telling folk to read what is actually written in the Bible or in the creeds or to look and see what the evidence shows attacks Biblical Christianity it is not I who is attacking but rather the Bible and the Creeds and reality that are the threat to Biblical Christianity.
Phat writes: In a way, you are marketing the basic idea that the best Jews are those who live a secular life, do good at every opportunity (as their Rabbi Jesus taught) and don't bother getting to know God except by doing good deeds every day and living like Gods people. Then support that charge. Point out where I said anything about what the best Jews are. Are Christians not supposed to be living like Gods people? Are we not supposed to do good deeds? When I post something related to the Bible is what is actually written in support of what I claim? Remember Phat, everyone on here has the ability to check what I say is written in the Bible against what is actually written in the Bible. What does the evidence show? Edited by jar, : appalin spallin Is--->If. Edited by jar, : clarify reading labels versus listening to the sales pitch.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Reality Faith.
It was the Deutsche Christen movement, Evangelical Protestant Christians that were major supporters of Hitler and who campaigned for Hitler and aligned the German Evangelical Protestant Christian Church in support of the anti-semitism, racism of the Nazi party.
Edited by jar, : left a t out Edited by jar, : put a the in put your left foot in put your left foot out ... Edited by jar, : fix flag Edited by jar, : again Edited by jar, : slow
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 92 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Evidence Faith, evidence.
It was still Protestant EVANGELICAL Christians that were supporting the Nazis and were Nazis, and Nazism/Fascism are Conservative not Liberal organizations just as today's US Fascists are Conservatives. AbE: you need to stop making God and Christianity in YOUR image. Edited by jar, : see AbE:
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024