Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 49 (9181 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: joebialek123
Post Volume: Total: 918,287 Year: 5,544/9,624 Month: 569/323 Week: 66/143 Day: 9/19 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How can we regulate guns ... ?
Larni
Member (Idle past 96 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 510 of 955 (687604)
01-14-2013 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 496 by ICANT
01-13-2013 3:39 PM


Re: The case for limiting the number of bullets that can be fired
Well the only reason is will never happen is because the constitution says we can possess Arms.
I'm always interested in this thought process so if you could answer a couple of questions I (as a Brit with little experience with wanting to own firearms) would be intrigued.
Do you realistically think that the government will turn on American population?
Do you think if the government had the will and consent of the military that a host of civilian men and women with guns could do anything to stop them?
Why have other Western democratic governments with no population of armed civilians not taken over in the way you have described?
All the best.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 496 by ICANT, posted 01-13-2013 3:39 PM ICANT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 513 by ICANT, posted 01-14-2013 1:39 PM Larni has replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 96 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 519 of 955 (687619)
01-14-2013 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 513 by ICANT
01-14-2013 1:39 PM


Re: The case for limiting the number of bullets that can be fired
Thanks ICANT, it's interesting to hear you opinion as us Brits often forget the USA has a radically different history to the UK.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 513 by ICANT, posted 01-14-2013 1:39 PM ICANT has seen this message but not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 96 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 602 of 955 (687767)
01-16-2013 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 520 by New Cat's Eye
01-14-2013 4:05 PM


Is one of the social issues that needs that be addressed the desire to own guns?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 520 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-14-2013 4:05 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 610 by New Cat's Eye, posted 01-16-2013 2:43 PM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024