Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 3/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

We Need States

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Prev12345
Author Topic:   We Need States
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

crashfrog Posts Only
Message 61 of 63 (680721)
11-20-2012 10:06 PM 		Reply to: Message 60 by Jon
11-20-2012 9:10 PM

Re: Legal confusion
Once again you are inventing your opponent's argument to suit your fancy.
​
"Once again"? Just a minute ago you were accusing me of ignoring it. Now you're accusing me of having invented it. Is there any wonder everyone thinks you're an idiot?
​
What sort of a scenario qualifies as a 'promotion' of State policy into Federal policy?
​
Well, I gave a scenario when I explained how Dr. A's slavery example wasn't convincing.
​
Except, you know, the words your opponents are actually using to formulate their arguments.
​
Which "words" am I ignoring? Be specific.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Jon, posted 11-20-2012 9:10 PM Jon has seen this message but not replied
  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 306 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006

Dr Adequate Posts Only

(1)
Message 62 of 63 (680774)
11-21-2012 7:04 AM 		Reply to: Message 57 by crashfrog
11-18-2012 9:43 PM

Re: Legal confusion
You're eliding a stupendous amount of history in order to make Federalism seem like an orderly process of promoting the results of state experimentation to Federal law.
​
No I'm not. Here's a clue that I'm not: I never said that Federalism was an orderly process of promoting the results of state experimentation to Federal law.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by crashfrog, posted 11-18-2012 9:43 PM crashfrog has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by crashfrog, posted 11-21-2012 7:52 AM Dr Adequate has not replied
  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1489 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003

crashfrog Posts Only
Message 63 of 63 (680779)
11-21-2012 7:52 AM 		Reply to: Message 62 by Dr Adequate
11-21-2012 7:04 AM

Re: Legal confusion
I never said that Federalism was an orderly process of promoting the results of state experimentation to Federal law.
​
Well, ok, I guess. I never said it was, either. I guess that's something we agree on, then.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by Dr Adequate, posted 11-21-2012 7:04 AM Dr Adequate has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Prev12345
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024