Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 69 (9101 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: sensei
Upcoming Birthdays: Tusko
Post Volume: Total: 904,370 Year: 1,251/14,231 Month: 175/1,076 Week: 284/234 Day: 50/86 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(4)
Message 2 of 845 (677698)
10-31-2012 10:39 PM


Alfred Maddenstein
There is way too much snark in his posts; it is totally unproductive, and wears thin very quickly. Here's an example:
Message 144
No, Tacky. Every experiment indicates waves thereby indicating there is a medium that allows the waving. No ether is postulated in the hypothesis. Your span of attention is too short. It is double helix ropes connecting all the atoms that is conceptualised, not ether as ether is contradictory too.
You are talking through your hat again. Photons are but mathematical entities. Remember, in the theory they are only counted and do not do any travelling anyway. It's waves again that propagate. That needs a medium necessarily. That is clear since there is no handless shake coming from you lot in my post. Only your usual spewing of second hand nonsense.
That is why the ropes are conceptualised rationally explaining a lot of phenomena as a result . If you can come up with a better explanation including a better fitting medium, please do. Until that time the Gaede's ropes trump anything else.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nwr, posted 11-01-2012 1:21 AM Coyote has not replied
 Message 4 by Alfred Maddenstein, posted 11-02-2012 4:43 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 112 of 845 (690654)
02-15-2013 12:12 AM


CoolBeans
CoolBeans would be better engaging the comments in the threads he has started and stop proposing new threads.
He has been seriously taken to task in the C14 threads, and I'm waiting for some substantive replies.
Instead it looks like he is just proposing new threads in which to be wrong.

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by Panda, posted 02-15-2013 8:26 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(2)
Message 126 of 845 (692514)
03-04-2013 11:43 AM


Our newest Archangel poster is just plain nuts:
Message 75

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
Belief gets in the way of learning--Robert A. Heinlein
How can I possibly put a new idea into your heads, if I do not first remove your delusions?--Robert A. Heinlein
It's not what we don't know that hurts, it's what we know that ain't so--Will Rogers

Replies to this message:
 Message 127 by Theodoric, posted 03-04-2013 12:06 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied
 Message 128 by Rahvin, posted 03-04-2013 1:34 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 161 of 845 (697072)
04-20-2013 11:17 PM


Dennis?
He's back???!!
Message 1

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(2)
Message 177 of 845 (708874)
10-15-2013 8:42 PM


Time for summary?
Time for summary on the WTF is wrong with people thread?

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 182 of 845 (718583)
02-07-2014 5:57 PM


Jaf has lost it

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by RAZD, posted 02-07-2014 6:19 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied
 Message 186 by Dr Adequate, posted 02-08-2014 10:36 AM Coyote has not replied
 Message 187 by jar, posted 02-08-2014 10:53 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 188 of 845 (718883)
02-09-2014 12:15 PM


mini-rant
Not suggesting any action, but this seems to be an inappropriate comment to post in the Science Forum:
Of course anybody who denies that the Bible is God's own revelation to us is going to have a problem with starting from the Flood, but since it IS God's own revelation to us it would be foolish for science NOT to start there, because in that case the Biblical revelation IS evidence, the primary evidence, and all the rest of the evidence has to conform to it.
Message 175
Maybe we need a "mixed" forum of some kind where these kinds of posts wouldn't be so out of place?

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by AdminModulous, posted 02-09-2014 12:34 PM Coyote has not replied
 Message 191 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2014 12:57 PM Coyote has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 194 of 845 (718908)
02-09-2014 2:00 PM
Reply to: Message 193 by AdminModulous
02-09-2014 1:55 PM


Re: mini-rant
I see no reason to suspect its going to become any form of issue.
I certainly don't want to make it any big issue, that's why I put "no action needed" in my post.
But it is just unseemly that religion is being used as an argument to completely trash evidence, science, and the scientific method -- in the Science Forum.
But, carry on.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 193 by AdminModulous, posted 02-09-2014 1:55 PM AdminModulous has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2014 2:12 PM Coyote has replied
 Message 197 by Admin, posted 02-09-2014 2:32 PM Coyote has seen this message but not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


(1)
Message 196 of 845 (718912)
02-09-2014 2:18 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by arachnophilia
02-09-2014 2:12 PM


Re: mini-rant
You're right!
I apologize. Got the forums mixed up.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by arachnophilia, posted 02-09-2014 2:12 PM arachnophilia has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 235 of 845 (737774)
09-29-2014 10:54 PM


Spam
Spam
Message 1

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 236 of 845 (737779)
09-30-2014 4:23 AM


Spam

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 237 of 845 (738021)
10-03-2014 10:20 PM


Spam
This and three previous are spams:
Message 1

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 244 of 845 (741162)
11-10-2014 10:12 AM


Spam

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 253 of 845 (742803)
11-24-2014 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 252 by michellebucks74
11-24-2014 7:15 PM


Re: The Vore Store
Spam immediately upthread.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 252 by michellebucks74, posted 11-24-2014 7:15 PM michellebucks74 has not replied

  
Coyote
Member (Idle past 1597 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008


Message 260 of 845 (745429)
12-22-2014 7:33 PM


Blog advertizing?
Blog advertizing?
Message 895

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2023