Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 59 (9094 total)
5 online now:
AZPaul3, nwr, PaulK, Theodoric (4 members, 1 visitor)
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Upcoming Birthdays: Raphael
Post Volume: Total: 901,287 Year: 12,399/6,534 Month: 1,892/1,988 Week: 13/460 Day: 13/60 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Report Discussion Problems Here 4.0
Straggler
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 10332
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


(1)
Message 22 of 823 (681273)
11-24-2012 8:45 AM
Reply to: Message 21 by Admin
11-24-2012 8:23 AM


Re: Moderator attention in that thread
Well as one of the lunkheads can I just say that I am genuinely not trying to misrepresent Crash and that I do in fact quite enjoy his uncompromising style of debate.
I think he is simply wrong in that thread but I'm not out to get him at all. From what little I know I think I'd quite like the guy if we were to ever meet.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by Admin, posted 11-24-2012 8:23 AM Admin has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by crashfrog, posted 11-24-2012 10:01 AM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 10332
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


(1)
Message 142 of 823 (694144)
03-22-2013 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by kofh2u
03-22-2013 11:02 AM


Re: ...destroying their erroneous statements...
I think you should propose a thread specifically dedicated to your graphical inventions. Such a thread might make it to the 'Is it science?' section of the forum. Or it might end up in the 'Free for all' area.
Eiether way it will be a place to put forward these ideas of yours without clogging up every single other thread with the same picture of inter-linked squares and triangles.
Kof writes:
Why not try to accept the Graphic Organization of the Elemental Particles as an amazing piece of scientifically derived information?
These self-constructed graphics linking science and religion - Did you invent them or discover them?
Objectively speaking could anyone have come to the same conclusions as you and if so why haven't they?
these are the questions you could start your new thread with....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by kofh2u, posted 03-22-2013 11:02 AM kofh2u has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by Admin, posted 03-22-2013 1:14 PM Straggler has replied
 Message 149 by kofh2u, posted 03-22-2013 9:16 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Straggler
Member (Idle past 391 days)
Posts: 10332
From: London England
Joined: 09-30-2006


Message 144 of 823 (694152)
03-22-2013 1:30 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by Admin
03-22-2013 1:14 PM


Re: ...destroying their erroneous statements...
Admin writes:
I think these images that Kofh2u has posted so many times and that have become so familiar should be restricted to the Kof2hu's 22 species corresponding to Genesis thread.
OK. But bizzarrely that seems to be the only recent thread that the elements/particles/squares&triangles pictures haven't yet been posted.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by Admin, posted 03-22-2013 1:14 PM Admin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by Admin, posted 03-22-2013 4:51 PM Straggler has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022