Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 48 (9179 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,229 Year: 5,486/9,624 Month: 511/323 Week: 8/143 Day: 8/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Foreveryoung Discussions
JonF
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


(1)
Message 43 of 103 (677559)
10-30-2012 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by foreveryoung
10-30-2012 2:38 PM


People would bring up the heat problem but I had answers for them as well.
You haven't posted any answers to the heat and radiation problems 'round here. This thread isn't the place for it, but you should definitely start a thread on radiometric dating. Maybe I will.
I got around that by saying that all the physical constants changed in tandem in such a way that no physical manifestation would show.
Just sayin' it doesn't do. As I've pointed out many times, the trick is to show a set of changes to various physical constants that do show a physical manifestation (accelerated decay) and are not refuted by existing observations. Setterfield's been trying to do it for decades and hasn't succeeded.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by foreveryoung, posted 10-30-2012 2:38 PM foreveryoung has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by dwise1, posted 10-30-2012 3:50 PM JonF has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 283 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 44 of 103 (677560)
10-30-2012 3:41 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by foreveryoung
10-30-2012 2:38 PM


.
Edited by JonF, : Damn! Duplicate again!!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by foreveryoung, posted 10-30-2012 2:38 PM foreveryoung has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024