Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 50 (9179 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,211 Year: 5,468/9,624 Month: 493/323 Week: 133/204 Day: 3/4 Hour: 1/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Foreveryoung Discussions
Member (Idle past 2219 days)
Posts: 6117
Joined: 01-12-2008

Message 77 of 103 (677764)
11-01-2012 11:12 AM
Reply to: Message 75 by dwise1
11-01-2012 10:47 AM

A brief aside
You mentioned the three pelvises that were compared in slides in a lecture you attended.
When I first taught Introduction to Physical Anthropology in 1975 I started the class by passing out three replica innominates to the students and asking them to divide them into two groups.
After a while they agreed that the first two went together, while the third was very different.
They innominates were 1) a modern human, 2) a fossil about 2.5 million years old, and 3) a chimpanzee.
After that I didn't hear a single word from any creationists who might have been in that class!

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 75 by dwise1, posted 11-01-2012 10:47 AM dwise1 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Percy, posted 11-01-2012 11:19 AM Coyote has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024