Dude, how old are you and what is your level of accademic acheivement?
The way you post you sound like somebody homeschooled, who is just entering a secualr university who finds her previous edcuation means mainstream science is just plain weird.
How much exposure to external educational institutions have you had?
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer. -Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation -Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities. -Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
Actually it was a response to the pissing match going on here over a period of a number of months. My point was that if we allow people to just post made up stuff the discussion goes seriously off track. I guess contextually it failed.