Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9159 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: K.Rose
Post Volume: Total: 914,831 Year: 2,088/9,624 Month: 1,521/567 Week: 129/338 Day: 1/12 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Solar flares affect radiometric decay rates?
Larni
Member (Idle past 135 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 64 of 67 (733795)
07-21-2014 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 62 by OS
07-21-2014 8:54 AM


Dude, how old are you and what is your level of accademic acheivement?
The way you post you sound like somebody homeschooled, who is just entering a secualr university who finds her previous edcuation means mainstream science is just plain weird.
How much exposure to external educational institutions have you had?

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by OS, posted 07-21-2014 8:54 AM OS has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024