Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,756 Year: 4,013/9,624 Month: 884/974 Week: 211/286 Day: 18/109 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Religious Right and Evangelicals
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 1 of 50 (334350)
07-22-2006 6:34 PM


inconsistency and false gospel?
Evangelical: Religious Right Has Distorted the Faith : NPR
on the book Thy Kingdom Come: How the Religious Right Distorts the Faith and Threatens America: An Evangelical's Lament
read, listen, consider. then, discuss carefully.
if you have read the book, i'd love to hear your opinion.
i have not read it, but i would like to. i like what he says about "insufficiently pro-life". whether i personally hold said beliefs, i have always found the religious right to be inconsistent in their claims and their actual alliegences. further, i have found their political beliefs to be inconsistent with the commands of scripture. above all, christ command love and forgiveness and mercy and meekness. the religious right demonstrates none of these in their politics which are made up of "this is the unutterably evil thing we're railing against today".
there is a difference between seeking righteousness and seeking to be right. i feel there is too much of the latter.
i have always known that evangelicals did not start out opposed to abortion. the church very much supported legalization. and then they changed their minds. i'm all about people being able to change their minds, but to later lie about it is bad form.
social issues i suppose. those topic subject lines are really vague..
it could be coffee house, but i know how this will go.
Edited by brennakimi, : edited just before move. move didn't keep the edit.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Discreet Label, posted 07-23-2006 3:45 PM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 8 by RAZD, posted 07-23-2006 5:57 PM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 12 by jar, posted 07-23-2006 10:02 PM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 19 by randman, posted 07-30-2006 5:12 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
AdminPD
Inactive Administrator


Message 2 of 50 (334353)
07-22-2006 6:35 PM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5089 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 3 of 50 (334542)
07-23-2006 3:45 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by macaroniandcheese
07-22-2006 6:34 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
I'm not sure what you are interested in discussing. But I did read the article and was fascinated by the book, I will probably pick it up in a few days.
What I found curious was the portion that talked about the initial reason for the formation of the religious right. That when the US government attempted to revoke Bob Jones Universities tax exempt status because of its discrimination policies is what pulled the trigger in forming the movement.
It would be interesting to me to consider what was such a threat about Bob Jones University and tax exampt status revoked. Did they see it as some sort of domino affect that might expand to include all religious affiliated orginizations? Or did they see it as an attack on Christianity itself because its attacking a university that is producing fresh evanglicals that will help promote false biological information and other important things important to creationism and associated biblical thoughts?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-22-2006 6:34 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 3:53 PM Discreet Label has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 4 of 50 (334544)
07-23-2006 3:53 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Discreet Label
07-23-2006 3:45 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
i may be mistaken, but i thought creationism (tm) was newer than that.
i think it's that they realized how much they could be effected if the government stopped treating christians differently from everyone else. i think this terrified them that they might lose some political power as well. so they had to mobilize and fast. then they snowballed (both ways) and picked up more issues tha would gve the church (tm) more clout.
i'm not really sure what i'm interested in discussing, either. i certainly don't want to get into a "true christian" fight about politics (again).
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Discreet Label, posted 07-23-2006 3:45 PM Discreet Label has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Discreet Label, posted 07-23-2006 3:59 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5089 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 5 of 50 (334545)
07-23-2006 3:59 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by macaroniandcheese
07-23-2006 3:53 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
Creationism (tm) is older then now anyways. They had the tm variation created as at least as early as the Scopes Trial I would think. Williams Jennings Bryan (president runner up as well as the most powerful political/religious leader of the time) supported the Bible over the science.
I mean Creatioism (tm) was not as sophisticated back then, and probably hadn't developed the kind of resources like AiG or ignorrant books. But it was in its beginning phase where it was using solely the Bible over canned/false arguements that are used now a days.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 3:53 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 4:05 PM Discreet Label has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 6 of 50 (334547)
07-23-2006 4:05 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Discreet Label
07-23-2006 3:59 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
i see.
yeah scopes, i guess i just didn't think about that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Discreet Label, posted 07-23-2006 3:59 PM Discreet Label has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by Discreet Label, posted 07-23-2006 4:25 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
Discreet Label
Member (Idle past 5089 days)
Posts: 272
Joined: 11-17-2005


Message 7 of 50 (334551)
07-23-2006 4:25 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by macaroniandcheese
07-23-2006 4:05 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
Well recommended information was that I also look into Henry Morris.
He appears to be pointed at as the father of the modern variation of Creationism (tm). Which however, also led me to George McCready Price, a canadian creationist. Price was apparently fundamental in the creation of Morris's viewpoint on flood geology. Price's literature was also fundamental piece of information that Bryan used at the Scopes Trial. So there appears to be a great deal of history behind the American Creationist movement...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 4:05 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 8 of 50 (334572)
07-23-2006 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by macaroniandcheese
07-22-2006 6:34 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
Interesting.
W. Barry Garrett of Baptist Press wrote, "Religious liberty, human equality and justice are advanced by the Supreme Court abortion decision." Indeed, even before the Roe decision, the messengers (delegates) to the 1971 Southern Baptist Convention gathering in St. Louis, Missouri, adopted a resolution that stated, "we call upon Southern Baptists to work for legislation that will allow the possibility of abortion under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother." W.A. Criswell, former president of the Southern Baptist Convention and pastor of First Baptist Church in Dallas, Texas, expressed his satisfaction with the Roe v. Wade ruling. "I have always felt that it was only after a child was born and had a life separate from its mother that it became an individual person," the redoubtable fundamentalist declared, "and it has always, therefore, seemed to me that what is best for the mother and for the future should be allowed."
Ya really gotta watch those extremist liberal southern baptists eh?
Just shows how latent bigotry can be so entrenched and form such a foundation for some peoples thoughts -- and what really motivates them.
Thanks. I have other places to post this.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDSHIV} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-22-2006 6:34 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 8:43 PM RAZD has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 9 of 50 (334637)
07-23-2006 8:43 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by RAZD
07-23-2006 5:57 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
i really do believe that the biggest problem with american christianity is the radical retrograde political movement and not really american church people. they are, i suppose, more impressionable than most, but they are being inspired of some horrible leaders.
i hate to bring on the wrath of the internet, but we all know that large numbers of people can very easily fall prey to radical retrograde political movements and do horrible awful things as a result of following a line of thought that begins very simply and continues into more tenuous areas based on "party loyalty".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by RAZD, posted 07-23-2006 5:57 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by RAZD, posted 07-23-2006 9:03 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1431 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 10 of 50 (334644)
07-23-2006 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by macaroniandcheese
07-23-2006 8:43 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
... large numbers of people can very easily fall prey to radical retrograde political movements ...
Particularly if their {moral compass\social conscience} is based on a borrowed {philosophical\religious\etc} source and not subject to personal scrutiny (invert golden rule\enlightened self-interest} -- then all it takes is a leader that convinces that that action {X} follows from {subscribed (assumed moral) belief Y} and they are off {X}ing as hard as possible.
How do you get so many soldiers to conspire to torture? Start by convincing them that {normal conventions} don't apply to {situation involved}. Tell them that {lives of "moral" friends and neighbors} depends on it.
Give me independent thinkers anytime.

Join the effort to unravel {AIDSHIV} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmericanOZen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 8:43 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 9:19 PM RAZD has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 11 of 50 (334651)
07-23-2006 9:19 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by RAZD
07-23-2006 9:03 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
precisely. all you have to say is that the "other side" is part of a "global conspiracy" to "destroy" your "nation and way of life" and you can get people to support anything. works EVERY TIME.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by RAZD, posted 07-23-2006 9:03 PM RAZD has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 12 of 50 (334660)
07-23-2006 10:02 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by macaroniandcheese
07-22-2006 6:34 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
Well, for those of us who actually lived through the period in question, the main thrust of the Christian Right was to maintain their Avoidance Schools so little Johnny or little Suzy wouldn't have to go to school with the monkeys. Christian Schools popped up like toadstools, every Baptist Church, every Evangelical Church suddenly had it's own School, and the Tax Exempt status was but one of the issues. The BIG issue was to keep the Evil Government from telling them they had to admit them black kids.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-22-2006 6:34 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 10:04 PM jar has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 13 of 50 (334662)
07-23-2006 10:04 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by jar
07-23-2006 10:02 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
that's what he says it was all about.
read more carefully.
Edited by brennakimi, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by jar, posted 07-23-2006 10:02 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by jar, posted 07-23-2006 10:24 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 14 of 50 (334666)
07-23-2006 10:24 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by macaroniandcheese
07-23-2006 10:04 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
And when exactly did I say it was not about that?
I am simply saying that regardless of what the current crop of Evangelicals and Fundamentalists claim, the reality is that their attention was on keeping their little schools and churches white as Ivory Soap and taxfree havens.
I agree that the Fundamentalist and Evangelicals are masters at revisionist history.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 10:04 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by macaroniandcheese, posted 07-23-2006 10:34 PM jar has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3953 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 15 of 50 (334670)
07-23-2006 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by jar
07-23-2006 10:24 PM


Re: inconsistency and false gospel?
ok
we were just discussing i suppose the more recent developments.
the good thing though, is that many have moved past the ivorysoap mentality. let me paint a picture though. in pensacola we have hicks, rednecks, and then more or less everyone else. rednecks are smarter than hicks but dumber than everyone else. but. hicks are better people. rednecks are racist. hicks are not. we decided it must be because the hicks are too stupid to see any differences while racists are smart enough to see differences but not smart enough to know that that doesn't make black people not people.
so i guess i'm scared that it will get worse before it gets better.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by jar, posted 07-23-2006 10:24 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by randman, posted 07-30-2006 5:21 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024