Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,479 Year: 3,736/9,624 Month: 607/974 Week: 220/276 Day: 60/34 Hour: 3/3


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Gun Control

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gun Control
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(6)
Message 39 of 310 (668995)
07-26-2012 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 10:28 AM


Re: Us poor scared people
What other explanation is there but fear when someone opposed gun ownership
I don't fear it, I find it stupid to arm civilians. Period. Has nothing to do with fear, at all.
Civilians cannot judge a situation properly to be allowed to defend themselves with a gun. Police officers and military personel have a hard enough time doing it and they are actually trained to do so.
Civilians should not be allowed to carry out deadly force when they see fit.
Hunting rifle, I'm cool with it - to include shotguns. But handguns for defense or to rise up against the US is stupid.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 10:28 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(2)
Message 41 of 310 (668998)
07-26-2012 11:09 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 10:52 AM


Re: Inclusive
u'd have to convince a lot of people that the risk of a handful of nuts with firearms (or laser arms, I guess) outweighed the cost of ending a uniquely American tradition and the risks of disarming the populace and leaving them unable to defend themselves.
Well since 85% of us think Jesus is coming back to save us all, this may be a futile attempt at persuading a large group of idiots. America makes me sad because of this, and the gun control issues, and the homophobia, and the racism, and the fat people.
But you can't even convince any of us that it would be worth it.
You don't think it's worth it not having armed civiians?
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 10:52 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 11:20 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(3)
Message 44 of 310 (669001)
07-26-2012 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by New Cat's Eye
07-26-2012 10:23 AM


o you have any idea how much that would cost? I realize its hyperbole, but the anti-gun crowd never seems to take the cost into account when they're all: "ZOMG, you could buy a grenade launcher, and a mini gun, and 100's of rifles n'stuff!".
Then it doesn't make much sense to have a law that says you can arm a militia to fight the government, when you can't even afford to buy a mini gun or lots of rifles n' stuff.
Who do you think you're going up against with a couple of handguns and a Winchester 30-30, an army of Hare Krishna's?
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-26-2012 10:23 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 47 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-26-2012 11:21 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 45 of 310 (669002)
07-26-2012 11:18 AM
Reply to: Message 43 by New Cat's Eye
07-26-2012 11:14 AM


Re: Inclusive
Briterican writes:
I have posted a link to a map of mass shootings in America... far more than you'll find in any other country. THAT is my evidence that there is something wrong with regard to guns and America.
CS writes:
But can you explain what and why is wrong?
Jesus Christ (Slave's voice)
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-26-2012 11:14 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-26-2012 11:27 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(3)
Message 49 of 310 (669006)
07-26-2012 11:29 AM
Reply to: Message 46 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 11:20 AM


Re: Inclusive
Then why are you even asking for evidence?
You feel armed, untrained people walking around carrying out deadly force is a-ok-USA when clearly the evidence shows how poorly people are at judging high pressured situations, much less when they have to hold a gun and shoot. Nor are you looking at the evidence that shows, any lunatic can buy a gun and shoot up any place they like. Does this not sound like something that shouldn't be taking place in a civilized country?
The death penalty I guess is ok then, so long as you're a dude holding a gun in the middle of the night pointing at a figure of a person in your home, right?
- Oni
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.
Edited by onifre, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 11:20 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 11:57 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 51 of 310 (669008)
07-26-2012 11:36 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by New Cat's Eye
07-26-2012 11:27 AM


Re: Inclusive
What - is wrong with regards to guns in America that causes far more mass shootings in America?
Me thinks it may have something to do with the guns in America.
In every country there are lunatics willing to kill a massive amount of people. But, in most countries they don't have guns to carry it out.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-26-2012 11:27 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 52 of 310 (669009)
07-26-2012 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by New Cat's Eye
07-26-2012 11:21 AM


But "arming a militia to fight the government" is just part of the justification, its not exclusively the sole purpose of owning guns.
It's the sole purpose of the Second Amendment.
Personally, I just like to go to the outdoor range and shoot fruit or paper.
So use pellet guns. There are plenty out there for target shooting.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-26-2012 11:21 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-26-2012 11:54 AM onifre has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 58 of 310 (669015)
07-26-2012 11:59 AM
Reply to: Message 50 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 11:35 AM


Re: Us poor scared people
Many of us in the US believe that it's "insane" to leave one's own defense and the defense of the people in the hands of corrupt cops and a distant government.
It's usually the same one's that believe Jesus is returning to save us, feel gays shouldn't marry, and the same who are quite uncomfortable with "the black guy" in the White House...who is probably a secret Muslim. You know, rational thinking bigots who need dem guns!
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 11:35 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 12:02 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(2)
Message 64 of 310 (669022)
07-26-2012 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 11:57 AM


Re: Inclusive
I'm asking for you to support your contention that it is worth it to have a completely disarmed populace.
The populance is not trained at defending themselves with deadly weapons. That's what the police is for. In fact, that's what the academy is for. They don't just arm people who want to be cops, they train them on how to do that. On the other hand, any fool can own a gun and use it. No ese bueno...
Or basically anything beyond "I'm afraid of people who own guns."
No one has said that. This is the strawman you are wildly taking swings at. As usual. I'm just waiting for the "I'm being misrepresented" and the "You're a liar" accusations to start coming.
Yeah, absolutely, if they've broken in to commit a crime.
Didn't say that. Just said a figure. Could be your wife or girlfriend...or boyfriend?
Can you explain why you think criminals have a right to expect perfect physical safety as they damage, destroy, and pilfer other people's property?
Notice everyone, now I "think" criminals have the right to expect a safe environment while they rob you. You read that well guys, that's what I THINK now. Oye vey, what a cunt.
Anywho...
There are other means to defend yourself other than guns. My friend has two trained pitbulls in his home, and no guns. Go in his house expecting "physical safety".
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 11:57 AM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 12:26 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 65 of 310 (669023)
07-26-2012 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 12:02 PM


Re: Us poor scared people
Correct positions aren't invalidated by the fact that many who hold them also hold other idiotic ideas. Wrong ideas are not made right by the fact that those who hold them may be on the side of the angels in other areas.
Well since its not the correct position, everything else you said IS invalidated.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 12:02 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 73 of 310 (669031)
07-26-2012 1:11 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 12:26 PM


Re: Inclusive
Says who?
The fact that most aren't police officers or former military (and only current former military.)
The vast majority of firearms owners train and practice with their firearms, recognizing that untrained use of a weapon is as much a danger to themselves as to other.
I said "untrained in a high pressured situation." Knowing how to hold a gun and how to properly put it in safety, which is what is learned at most gun safety classes, is NOT what I said.
Also, it's not required that one takes a gun safety course to even buy a gun, so you're hoping most people do that bare minimum.
But rather than recognize that as responsible gun ownership
Easy now, I have no doubt that someone, say, like Catholic Sci has the up most care when handling a gun (for the most part) and is a responsible gun owner.
Not what I'm talking about though. But I do recognize and value proper gun ownership.
Then I'd better make sure who they are and why they're there...
I should think so. The point is civilians are not trained at, nor should they be allowed to, know when a situation warrents deadly force or not. Could be your wife, could be a "murderer," who really knows.
I'll be sure to bring a pair of ketamine steaks.
Then play a piano and sing about what pitbulls dream of when they take a pitbull nap?
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 12:26 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 1:57 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 86 of 310 (669053)
07-26-2012 4:53 PM
Reply to: Message 78 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 1:57 PM


Re: Inclusive
I think you're overestimating how much training we're talking about. Believe it or not, police and military officers in training aren't studying gunplay 24-7.
Well that's why I said I don't want an armed police force either, except for special units like SWAT or DEA.
Military officers in training is not what I think you meant to write. Some college graduate in Officer training school is NOT someone I trust with a weapon either.
But having myself served in the Marine's Corp, I can tell you we get extensive training in boot camp with the M-16 in a variety of combat situations, and once you're in the fleet you get as much training as you want with other weapons. ANd even then, the experience to remain calm and fully control a situation comes through years of training and applying what is learned in combat.
I'd say a soldier serving in the militaryis pretty well versed in marksmanship, both with small arms and larger weapons, and is trained and has (these days) experienced high pressured situations. Them I trust. You, your wife or the avergae civilian I do not.
The training that police - get
I do not support an armed police force either.
...military personnel get is how to shoot what you're aiming at, how to keep the gun clean, under what circumstances you can be armed etc.
You're talking without knowledge again, crash. I've been in boot camp, a freshly graduated Marine recruit knows more about weapons and is well trained in combat situations, more so than you or your wife will ever be. And that's just a graduate.
There's no training in the world that will tell you whether the unfamiliar shadow in your living room is your son or an armed robber - that's something you have to determine yourself in that situation.
Of course not, but the training and experience are what keeps you calm and in control during these situations. Something you or your wife will not be able to do. Sorry, neither of you is trained for hostile situations.
It's that very ignorance and arrogance that makes you think you can do it, untill you fuck up and shoot the wrong/innocent person. There are too many cases like this, from not only civilians but by police officers.
There simply is no need for an armed civilian population.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 78 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 1:57 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 5:20 PM onifre has replied
 Message 125 by New Cat's Eye, posted 07-27-2012 3:35 PM onifre has replied
 Message 129 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-27-2012 6:36 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(2)
Message 88 of 310 (669056)
07-26-2012 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 87 by Jon
07-26-2012 4:59 PM


Compare: The violent Middle East; an area of the world rife with ideological and cultural extremism, mass ignorance, and serious racial/ethnic inequalities.
And the U.S.; a country rife with religious and ideological extremism, mass ignorance, and serious racial/ethnic inequalities.
I, personally, don't think the explanations could be anymore obvious.
Very well put.
It's no wonder that our country, where 85% believe in the return of Jesus, a majority are homophobic, more than half believe Obama is a secret Muslim, more than half don't accept evolution, with failing schools and racist politicians, that we suffer the same violent trends that the Middle East does too.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by Jon, posted 07-26-2012 4:59 PM Jon has seen this message but not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(3)
Message 91 of 310 (669062)
07-26-2012 5:41 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 5:20 PM


Re: Inclusive
So it's not just an armed citizenry you oppose, it's an armed police and an armed military.
Can you read? Seriously...do you comprehend shit? You do this way too often for it to be just you typing too fast without reading.
I said I don't support an armed police force, as in armed beat cops. I DO support armed SWAT, or special units that are trained. For the very reason YOU gave, that cops aren't trained that well.
Now where the fuck did I say I don't support an armed military?
If a guy breaks into my house to rob and maybe kill me, and my only option is to wait for the Marines to show up (how do they even know to come?) in what possible sense am I "in control"? Even if I called the police, what use would that be except to put more unarmed people into harm's way?
You're an idiot dude.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 5:20 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 94 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 5:48 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2973 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


(1)
Message 150 of 310 (669280)
07-28-2012 6:01 PM
Reply to: Message 94 by crashfrog
07-26-2012 5:48 PM


Re: Inclusive
Sorry, I was away due to the heavy hand of tyranny.
What about places that don't have SWAT, Oni? You know - most of the country?
In places where there is no SWAT then a special unit can exist with advanced training. But this is far from the topic of civilians with guns.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by crashfrog, posted 07-26-2012 5:48 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024