I read the article and concede the explanation sounds reasonable except that the magnitude of energy from quantum fluctuation is greater than the dark energy proposal. As we understand it, quantum fluctuations are not a reasonable explanation for the vacuum energy. Account for that vacuum energy in real numbers by established quantum predictions and your nomination for the next Nobel Prize in physics is assured.
Total energy conservation in the Big Bang is a myth.
Well i call on the anthropic principle, there are 10 to the 500 power of possible universes and each can have a different value for dark energy if the value of ours was grater it would overpower gravity and we would not be here to talk about how it all began.
But the thing is if you dont like the big bang theory because it offends your bible then you have to find a noter explanation for what we observe.
Like the expansion of the universe
Cosmic microwave background radiation
The abundance of light elements
This is what the big bang theory explains and there is no contesting theory well except magic man dun it.
Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand
Click if you dare!