Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,357 Year: 3,614/9,624 Month: 485/974 Week: 98/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Nature belongs to ID
ringo
Member (Idle past 431 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 124 of 146 (663248)
05-22-2012 4:54 PM
Reply to: Message 121 by Vanessa
05-22-2012 3:55 PM


Re: work in progress
Vanessa writes:
... the benefit is achieved by a loss of information.
Different information isn't necessarily a "loss" of information. In your example, losing an arm doesn't constitute a loss of information. One arm or two arms is still the same amount of information.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by Vanessa, posted 05-22-2012 3:55 PM Vanessa has not replied

  
ringo
Member (Idle past 431 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


(4)
Message 146 of 146 (663337)
05-23-2012 12:02 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Vanessa
05-22-2012 5:47 PM


Re: work in progress
Vanessa writes:
There is an expression "Science progresses one funeral at a time." No scientist, in fact no person in authority, wants that authority undermined, overturned, quashed.
That seems to be a misquote and a thorough misunderstanding of Max Planck:
quote:
A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.
Planck meant the opposite of what you're saying. It's the ones who don't want their ideas changed that have to die out.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Vanessa, posted 05-22-2012 5:47 PM Vanessa has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024