The Death Knell for ID?

Is that some kind of uber-procrastination, where you get someone else to not do what you should be doing?

quote:

---

New Scientist magazine sent a reporter to the Biologic Institute facilities in late 2006 to investigate. The reporter, Celeste Biever, was given a fairly chilly reception and found few willing to speak to her about their research. Although the New Scientist article was somewhat negative, the Discovery Institute touted it as unequivocal evidence that the Biologic Institute is engaging in scientific research.

---

So...nothing new from intelligent design then.
Just some vague claims without any evidence to support them.
/golfclapYou spend so long trying to prove real science wrong that you forget that you are meant to be doing your own science.
Where is all this research that ID should have produced? What are the predictions?
To put it bluntly: what is the point in your ID science? It produces NOTHING (except maybe a warm fuzzy feeling as you lie to yourself that there is evidence of your christian god).Oh, and welcome to the forum. {abe} This is probably off-topic, so just consider them to be rhetorical questions.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.