I actually love a good challenging debate, that is why I come to this site.
Well, ok. Then perhaps you'd like to address this proof of evolution that no creationist has ever been able to respond to:
More Evidence of Evolution - Geomyidae and Geomydoecus
As you can see, the convergent phylogenies of Geomyidae and Geomydoecus prove that molecular phylogeny is a reliable technique for discerning evolutionary relationships, including the entire history of the evolution of life on Earth as discerned via 16S ribosomal subunit (and other reconstructions.)
Your response? (Please add it to that thread, not this one.)
Why would I do that? Anything I said on any of my posts, whether I was right or wrong, I at the very least BELIEVED what I was saying.
I doubt it. For instance - what are your primary sources for information about the theory of evolution?
If your answer is "creationists have told me what evolution says", then yes, you're being dishonest because you already know that the only honest way to learn about someone's position is from them.
Why give people an excuse by behaving like a child?
At some point, debating with a creationist becomes so pointless that we just try to entertain ourselves. You'll see. (It'll start when you're unable to muster any meaningful response to the convergent phylogenies of Geomyidae and Geomydoecus.)