Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 62 (9094 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Post Volume: Total: 901,806 Year: 12,918/6,534 Month: 201/2,210 Week: 142/390 Day: 51/47 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Another anti-evolution bill, Missouri 2012
Rrhain
Member (Idle past 1304 days)
Posts: 6349
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 32 of 283 (648491)
01-16-2012 4:40 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by marc9000
01-15-2012 8:46 PM


marc9000 writes:
quote:
Another question would be if the scientific community has made any advances concerning the origins of life which would render the Dover decision right.
Huh? I thought we were talking about evolution. Evolution doesn't have anything to say about the origin of life and is compatible with any method you care to name. Life could have arisen chemically through abiogensis, supernaturally through god zap-poofing it into existence, extraterrestrially through panspermia or alien seeding, interdimensionally through a rift in space-time, so long as that life did not replicate perfectly from generation to generation, then evolution is satisfied.

Rrhain

Thank you for your submission to Science. Your paper was reviewed by a jury of seventh graders so that they could look for balance and to allow them to make up their own minds. We are sorry to say that they found your paper "bogus," specifically describing the section on the laboratory work "boring." We regret that we will be unable to publish your work at this time.

Minds are like parachutes. Just because you've lost yours doesn't mean you can use mine.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by marc9000, posted 01-15-2012 8:46 PM marc9000 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022