Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 59 (9094 total)
7 online now:
Kleinman, nwr, PaulK, Theodoric, vimesey, xongsmith (6 members, 1 visitor)
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Upcoming Birthdays: Raphael
Post Volume: Total: 901,291 Year: 12,403/6,534 Month: 1,896/1,988 Week: 17/460 Day: 17/60 Hour: 4/2

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Another anti-evolution bill, Missouri 2012
Posts: 6178
From: Geneva, Illinois
Joined: 08-08-2005
Member Rating: 3.3

Message 119 of 283 (649167)
01-20-2012 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by marc9000
01-20-2012 9:24 PM

Re: That didn't take long!
marc9000 writes:
I pointed out in an earlier post that ID was the only scientific discipline that had to face an entrance exam (court case).
But that's total BS, and you ought to be smart enough to know that.
If ID researchers produce good science that is important enough to not be ignored, then scientists will themselves be insisting that ID be in the classroom.
What happened, in reality, is that religious fundamentalists tried to do an end run around both the constitution and science, by using politics (rather than science) to get it into the science classroom.
If you want ID in the classroom, then call off the lawyers, call off the theologists, call off the religious politicians. Get some good scientists working on ID, to see if they can come up with important science.

Jesus was a liberal hippie

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by marc9000, posted 01-20-2012 9:24 PM marc9000 has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022