Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 51 (9179 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: Jorge Parker
Post Volume: Total: 918,177 Year: 5,434/9,624 Month: 459/323 Week: 99/204 Day: 15/26 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Humour VII
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(4)
Message 132 of 1042 (656005)
03-15-2012 12:03 PM
Reply to: Message 131 by rueh
03-15-2012 11:51 AM


Re: Just one wish
That reminded me of one of my favorite Cyanide and Happiness comics:
Y'all should click that link, they're hilarious. Click on "Comics" for Cyanide and Happiness.
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 131 by rueh, posted 03-15-2012 11:51 AM rueh has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(2)
Message 171 of 1042 (657650)
03-29-2012 5:37 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by rueh
03-28-2012 3:43 PM


Redneck Medical Terms
Benign....................What you be after you be eight.
Bacteria..................Back door to cafeteria.
Barium....................What you do with dead folks.
Cesarean Section.....A neighborhood in Rome.
Catscan...................Searching for the cat.
Cauterize.................Made eye contact with her.
Colic........................A sheep dog.
Coma......................A punctuation mark.
D&C........................Where Washington is.
Dilate......................To live longer than your kids do.
Enema....................Not a friend.
Fester.....................Quicker than someone else.
Fibula......................A small lie.
G.I.Series................World Series of military baseball.
Hangnail........... ......What you hang your coat on.
Hospital..................The biggest building in town
Impotent.................Distinguished, well known.
Labor Pain...............Getting hurt at work.
Morbid....................A higher offer than I bid.
Nitrates..................Cheaper than day rates.
Medical Staff...........A Doctor's cane, sometimes shown with a snake.
Node......................I knew it.
Outpatient..............A person who has fainted.
Pap Smear..............A fatherhood test.
Pelvis.....................Second cousin to Elvis.
Post Operative........A letter carrier.
Recovery Room.......Place to do upholstery.
Secretion................Hiding something
Tablet.....................A small table to change babies on.
Seizure...................Roman emperor who lived in the Ceasarean Section.
Terminal Illness.......Getting sick at the train station.
Tumor.....................More than one.
Urine......................Opposite of mine.
Varicose.................Near by.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by rueh, posted 03-28-2012 3:43 PM rueh has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 174 of 1042 (657800)
03-30-2012 3:01 PM
Reply to: Message 173 by 1.61803
03-30-2012 1:46 PM


Its like this guy in handcuffs:
http://youtu.be/fqjWW-sahMg
quote:
Won't scratch my nuts?
Can I scratch my nuts?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by 1.61803, posted 03-30-2012 1:46 PM 1.61803 has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 227 of 1042 (660430)
04-25-2012 3:05 PM
Reply to: Message 224 by rueh
04-25-2012 1:00 PM


Re: British Al Qaeda
The suicide bombers' union, the British Organization of Occupational Martyrs...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 224 by rueh, posted 04-25-2012 1:00 PM rueh has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 228 of 1042 (660431)
04-25-2012 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 226 by onifre
04-25-2012 2:57 PM


Re: British Al Qaeda
I think I'll watch it again.
While doing push-ups? Or on a treadmill or something?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by onifre, posted 04-25-2012 2:57 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by onifre, posted 04-25-2012 3:58 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 335 of 1042 (667849)
07-12-2012 5:08 PM


EvC's favorite store

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(3)
Message 367 of 1042 (670159)
08-09-2012 2:41 PM
Reply to: Message 366 by xongsmith
08-09-2012 1:35 PM


BC
PaulNoth.com
Another one from there:
And a totally unrelated oldie that I ran across again today:

This message is a reply to:
 Message 366 by xongsmith, posted 08-09-2012 1:35 PM xongsmith has seen this message but not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(2)
Message 375 of 1042 (670979)
08-21-2012 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 372 by Shield
08-20-2012 7:40 PM



This message is a reply to:
 Message 372 by Shield, posted 08-20-2012 7:40 PM Shield has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 376 by ringo, posted 08-21-2012 1:04 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 401 of 1042 (671779)
08-30-2012 11:46 AM
Reply to: Message 399 by Dogmafood
08-29-2012 6:47 PM


Re: Immaculate preconception
As usually, with these "omg look what they said" things, I'm just left wondering what they actually really said....

This message is a reply to:
 Message 399 by Dogmafood, posted 08-29-2012 6:47 PM Dogmafood has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 402 by Theodoric, posted 08-30-2012 12:22 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 407 by Dogmafood, posted 08-31-2012 12:55 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 403 of 1042 (671786)
08-30-2012 12:31 PM
Reply to: Message 402 by Theodoric
08-30-2012 12:22 PM


Re: Immaculate preconception
Research is easy.
Letting others do it for you is easier.
Or how about the text of the act itself.
Yeah, that's what I was wondering about. It doesn't "states 'pregnancy begins two weeks before conception'". But we already know you don't really have to be that accurate when you're bashing the Right.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 402 by Theodoric, posted 08-30-2012 12:22 PM Theodoric has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 404 by Theodoric, posted 08-30-2012 1:34 PM New Cat's Eye has seen this message but not replied
 Message 405 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-30-2012 10:15 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 410 by Modulous, posted 08-31-2012 8:37 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(3)
(1)
Message 411 of 1042 (671907)
08-31-2012 11:10 AM
Reply to: Message 410 by Modulous
08-31-2012 8:37 AM


Re: Immaculate preconception
There might still be an issue. I haven't read the bill.
Well, isn't it written by a Pro-Life person? If they're trying to push back against abortion then it makes sense that they'd write it biased against abortion.
What it does is criminalize an abortion after 20 weeks gestational age. Gestation age is an actual term from obstetrics. It doesn't matter if you draw the line at 20 weeks since gestation, or 18 weeks since conception. The line is drawn where the line is drawn and that's what should be criticised.
I just think its hilarious that poeple jump on the "omg look what they said" bandwagon with such partison bias. They might as well be making fun of all of obstetrics for "stating" that women are pregnant 2 weeks before conception because of the way they define gestation age.
However, when using this method, one calculates the gestational time as being longer, 10 months, than otherwise - to compensate. If we're going to use this to determine where an abortion is legal - we should push those dates forward too. If this isn't being done, then we can rightly criticize those that authored, sponsored and voted for the bill.
Sure, I don't like the bill either. I just think its funny that people played the "they're so stupid look at this dumb thing they said" card, but since it was against a Republican, then all the leftys just jump on the bandwagon and don't even look into it. If it was being said about a Democrat, then people would've dug into it and figured out exactly what was said, looked into the background of the person who said they said otherwise, and then hung them out to dry - all the while thinking that they're skeptical and honest and unbiased.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 410 by Modulous, posted 08-31-2012 8:37 AM Modulous has seen this message but not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 412 of 1042 (671909)
08-31-2012 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 405 by Dr Adequate
08-30-2012 10:15 PM


Re: Immaculate preconception
But the quote didn't say that the bill states that pregnancy begins two weeks before conception. It says that it deems a woman pregnant two weeks before conception
I was going by the title of the source article:
http://www.examiner.com/...egins-two-weeks-before-conception
quote:
New law in Arizona states 'pregnancy begins two weeks before conception'
They even use apostrophies as if they were quoting the law.
Gestational age means the age of the unborn child as calculated from the first day of the last menstrual period of the pregnant woman.
This means that in some (indeed most) cases the fetus will be legally deemed to have existed before it was actually conceived.
Yeah, but its a normal term in obstetrics. Are we to be laughing at that entire field of medicine because they don't even know when and how babies are conceived?
Gawsh! They're so stupid!
quote:
On the first visit to her obstetrician or midwife, the pregnant woman is asked to carry out the antenatal record, which constitutes a medical history and physical examination. On subsequent visits, the gestational age (GA) is rechecked with each visit. source

This message is a reply to:
 Message 405 by Dr Adequate, posted 08-30-2012 10:15 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 449 of 1042 (672767)
09-11-2012 10:07 AM
Reply to: Message 441 by onifre
09-08-2012 12:55 PM


Re: An interview with a LEGEND
I thought this part was really funny!
http://youtu.be/0-Tzd_01koU?t=11m8s
For those who won't watch, they were checking out the new Call of Duty game and who the "bad guys" are. One of the last ones was fighting terrorists in the middle east and some sensitive folks got a little pissy about it. The latest ones is in the future and we're back to fighting russians. Oni's all: "Yeah, lets go back to killing white people so nobody get offended" I lol'd.
I was dissappointed that you don't game more. Especially admitting that you can't handle the first person shooters. Granted, it takes a lot of time to get good enough to survive and I suppose you have better things to do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 441 by onifre, posted 09-08-2012 12:55 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 451 by onifre, posted 09-21-2012 11:50 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(1)
Message 479 of 1042 (675488)
10-11-2012 3:42 PM


not hilarious but relevant

The truth of our faith becomes a matter of ridicule among the infidels if any Catholic, not gifted with the necessary scientific learning, presents as dogma what scientific scrutiny shows to be false. - St. Thomas Aquinas

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


(4)
Message 498 of 1042 (676431)
10-22-2012 4:57 PM
Reply to: Message 497 by Dr Adequate
10-22-2012 4:37 PM


Have you seen the "language differencies" memes?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 497 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-22-2012 4:37 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 500 by ringo, posted 10-23-2012 12:24 PM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 503 by dwise1, posted 10-23-2012 3:33 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024