I see Message 6 netted six jeers and zero responses. What does that tell us?
It tells us that people didn't like you post. That's what jeers are for. But feel free to make up rabidly crazy excuses to support your own paranoid delusions of grandeur and victimisation.
Buzsaw writes:
It is indicative that the jeers were biased and unwarranted. It is indicative that the message was irrefutable.
Ah - I see you did.
If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
when presented with a factual arguement you stop reponding
I abhor to engage you because you are like the one liner guy.
you make a statement that is...well...crazy (for lack of a better word).
then you are confronted with factual information, and you stop responding. your routine is older than you are.
That and the simple fact you are completely clueless about the Roman Catholic Church and all you can type is something biasedly negative that has little or no evidence to support it other than your ranting/raving about how evil the church is. You really show everyone how silly you are.
You are the kind of person that makes me wary to call myself a Christian.
quote:
I see Message 6 netted six jeers and zero responses. What does that tell us? It is indicative that the jeers were biased and unwarranted. It is indicative that the message was irrefutable.
Presumably then, when you jeer a message instead of replying, your jeer is biased and unwarranted and indicates that you cannot refute the message. Actually, that does seem to be the case.
I jeered your comment because it exhibits nothing but anti RCC bigotry. Convent brothels? What are you wittering about? Your link certainly doesn't have anything to do with convents, let alone convent brothels. What is a convent brothel in your eyes? I'm assuming that it's any convent, but feel free to correct me.
Your anti RCC bigotry is well-known on this forum, but this nonsense about conventbrothels is a new low, even for you. Tell me, did you actually read your own link? So that's why I jeered your comment - it contains erroneous information and smacks of hatred.
Do you know any Roman Catholics? Have you any Roman Catholic friends? If you do, do you include them in your blanket condemnation of the RCC?
OK, this time I did press the Jeer button and it's come up as a Cheer. Buz, you're sounding more and more like Ray Martinez (aka Cold Foreign Object, aka Willowtree) and his constant declarations of "inability to refute". Soon you'll be referring to "the eminent and learned scholar Dr Gene Scott, PhD".
Just because people think your post is crap doesn't make you right. Maybe, just maybe, it's because your post is, in fact, crap.
I could think up other reasons... but when have you ever gotten the sense from the Vatican that they think they should comform to the normal rules of decent society?
Um like stop feeding people the body of a man while wearing a dress
The curch has been a powerhouse for the past 1500 years the most powerfull organisation for most of that time possibly still are, conforming to what plebs think just isnt that high upon their list of things to do.
Making things like this, or child abuse, go away is. They also worry allot if sperm goes to waste, condoms are sin and stuff like that, and gays are evil stuff like that is way more important then a preacher who molests a child, or a priest who preaches raping women that had an abortion.
Christianity, One woman's lie about an affair that got seriously out of hand
Judging from your long history of posting jeers and not replying, you clearly don't have a problem with such 'trollish behaviour'. On balance though, hypocrisy is one of your nicer characteristics.
If I were you And I wish that I were you All the things I'd do To make myself turn blue
I jeered your comment because it exhibits nothing but anti RCC bigotry. Convent brothels? What are you wittering about? Your link certainly doesn't have anything to do with convents, let alone convent brothels. What is a convent brothel in your eyes? I'm assuming that it's any convent, but feel free to correct me. Your anti RCC bigotry is well-known on this forum, but this nonsense about conventbrothels is a new low, even for you. Tell me, did you actually read your own link? So that's why I jeered your comment - it contains erroneous information and smacks of hatred.
Do you know any Roman Catholics? Have you any Roman Catholic friends? If you do, do you include them in your blanket condemnation of the RCC?
First off, I have many close friends who are RCC.
Most of my favorite talk show hosts, with whom I agree and who I admire are RCC, including Quinn & Rose's War Room (favorite), Saun Hannity, Laura Ingram, and Bill Bennett, etc.
Some RCC priests have become quite evangelical. More power to them.
Two RCC presidential candidates whom I would vote for are Rick Sanatorium and Newt Gingrich.
etc, etc......
Trixie, your charge of bigotry and false allegations need to be supported by you, before airing them and personally attacking me. Do you have any idea what's in the two books which I cited?
The RCC history of the bloody inquisitions is irrefutable, as are other atrocities. Do some Goggling on some of it, as well as the brothels, the books, etc before posting demeaning personal attacks and judging others
Facts are facts and to be fair, should not be construed as bigotry and hatred whether they apply to race, religion, relationships, or whatever.
Judging from your long history of posting jeers and not replying, you clearly don't have a problem with such 'trollish behaviour'.
Tell me, how do you tell which are mine and which are others. There's a notorious pack of you trolls who troll me with substance-less nothingness, preventing the threads from moving forward and I get blamed by admins for it.
Trolls can expect jeers when they deserve them. I don't jeer indiscriminately, by any means.
BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Someone wisely said something ;ike, "Before fooling with a fool, make sure the fool is a fool."
™ Version 4.2
(1)
