Summations Only

Yeah, The Parable of the Dishonest Mechanic.Anyway - back to vimesey's Parable of the Honest Mechanic...
Did you understand it?
Did you learn anything from it?

That was a very long-winded way of saying that you don't know the answer to Catholic Scientist's question.Edited by Panda, : Replaced 'The' with 'That'

Try again: how much of the solar system is the sun?Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

The sun is only about 1.4 million km in diameter and the solar system is more than 4.5 billion km in diameter.
So, your 99.99% figure looks to be completely wrong.

I wasn't asking about mass.
Try again: how much of the solar system is the sun? Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Well, you could always look at the question to find out. No it isn't.
That figure is referring to its mass.
I was not asking about mass.Try again: how much of the solar system is the sun?

He relies on gish gallops and red herrings.
Simply find a single statement he has made and repeatedly ask him to defend it.
If, after several attempts to change the subject, he realises you aren't following him down the 'rabbit hole', he stops replying.It is not a successful discussion per se, but it does show he has nothing to support his claims - and it helps address any feelings of being trolled when he simply shuts up and runs away.Pick on something simple - like his "99 orders of magnitude" claim: keep asking him to explain how he could make such a basic error.
He will eventually go off in a sulk.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Sorry Percy, justatruthseeker doesn't do answers - even to the simplest of questions.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Your reading comprehension is sub-normal.

Soooo.....you still can't tell the difference between a black hole and a singularity.
You aren't really doing very well, are you.

That is because you are unable to admit that you can't tell the difference between a black hole and a singularity.
You prefer distraction to honesty.As I said, you still can't tell the difference between a black hole and a singularity.
You really aren't doing very well, are you./patEdited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

So....you still can't tell the difference between black holes and singularities.Even your own links show that they aren't the same.Since all the links provided by both others and yourself show that black holes and singularities are NOT the same, there seems little reason to post any more links.But let's look at your first link: Singularities and Black Holes (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Even the title tells you that they aren't the same: "Singularities and Black Holes".
But maybe you didn't read that far.Let's look at your quote:

quote:

---

As purely gravitational entities, black holes are at the heart of many attempts to formulate a theory of quantum gravity. Although they are regions of spacetime, black holes are also thermodynamical entities, with a temperature and an entropy; however, it is far from clear what statistical physics underlies these thermodynamical facts. The evolution of black holes is also apparently in conflict with standard quantum evolution, for such evolution rules out the sort of increase in entropy that seems to be required when black holes are present.

---

Oh look! It says black holes are NOT the same as singularities !Well, it is good of you to argue our point, but you are meant to be supporting your own claims.So - you still can't tell the difference despite ALL the links you have provided describing that difference.
/golfclapEdited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

You're going to have to raise your game if you want JustATurdSeeker to reply to your posts.
At best I would describe your comment as 'sarky'; you need to actually post something insulting to get a reply.