|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Occupy Wall Street | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
xongsmith Member Posts: 2620 From: massachusetts US Joined: |
Rahvin writes:
I suddenly have even more respect for Civil Rights and Vietnam-era protesters, who wouldn't typically have been able to combat media spin with video evidence, or to circulate it on a global scale instantly like we can with the internet. David Brin has been pushing ceaselessly for the right of citizens to spy on their own government. People should be allowed to film police beatings and other such shit from the power structure.- xongsmith, 5.7d
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4061 Joined: Member Rating: 10.0
|
Wouldn't it fuckin' kill the Evil Kings in power of this sorry country to see the demonstrators sporting AK-47s? "Go ahead - shoot a canister at my face, sucker." Oh I so wanted to see them build a trebouchet and launch the park's weekly supply of excrement up at those vicious assholes joking and drinking champagne. Smear them all with shit. Wow. That's not at all what I'm about. Escalation just results in more death. I'm outraged over a guy who got shot in the face with a tear gas canister. How outraged do you think I'll be if someone gets shot in the face with a bullet? I don't want cops getting shot. I don't want protestors getting shot. I don't even want the rich getting shot. My goal is the improvement of human life, not the loss of human life. My goal is positive change, not retribution. Civil disobedience is fine, and I have absolutely no problem with it. But bringing an AK-47 to a rally? I was disgusted when Teabaggers brought guns and talked about "second amendment solutions," and I'm no less disgusted when anyone else suggests the same thing, regardless of the perceived political "side."
Nobody who advocates for violence or guns or killing is on my side.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member
|
PMJC writes: Video clearly shows the police tossing some kind of device (that explodes, bright light and smoke) directly into the (small, unarmed, nonviolent) group trying to help an injured protester. So there's one gross violation.I've heard the OPD blaming the officers from "other" places for pretty much all of the bad behavior. Not OUR fault, must have been officers from Petaluma or Navato. It's clearly not the OPDs responsibility to make sure those reinforcements they've called in act in accordance with the city policies. That would be asking far too much. Seems to me the OPD should have been arresting the out-of-town officers then. Weren't they, too, breaking the law? The mobsters were not unarmed. They were armed with anything they could get their hands on including stones and fire extinguishers, etc etc. All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers. Given the radical left wing liberal atmosphere in Oakland, it must have been bad for the police and town fathers to stop the destruction violence and rebellion against law authorities. .Had it been in Iowa or Montana etc, one might expect the police to react. Had they not called in outside enforcement, likely they would've been over-run by the frenzied mobs. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4061 Joined: Member Rating: 10.0 |
All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers. You will of course show evidence of the Oakland Occupy protestors throwing objects at police before the police opened fire. By the definition you're using, everyone is always armed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member (Idle past 125 days) Posts: 4001 From: Adirondackia Joined: |
Let's be explicit, Buz.
You support the firing of a tear gas cannister at close range into the face of a peacefully protesting Marine vet. You support tossing a flash-bang into the group of people huddled around the critically injured man. Is that right?"If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Buzsaw Inactive Member
|
Beginning with Muslim nations, the notion of rebellion is spreading globally. It's all indicative of implementing a globalist socialist New World Order. Note that Muslims are participating in the US protests. Assuredly they're active in many nations. This all goes well with the Muslim doctrine, beginning with Mohammed of global dominancy via procreation, violence and rebellion.
Sharia Islam is expanding globally, nation by nation, region by region and increased influence in the UN world body. This all pertains to fulfillment of the Biblical prophets regarding the end times and Armageddon. BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW. The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4061 Joined: Member Rating: 10.0
|
About the Marine veteran:
quote: Seems our veteran is a decorated Marine who served multiple tours in Iraq, and is currently employed, spending only his nights, his personal free time, at Occupy protests. Is this Marine part of the "rent-a-mob," Buz?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4061 Joined: Member Rating: 10.0 |
Beginning with Muslim nations, the notion of rebellion is spreading globally. It's all indicative of implementing a globalist socialist New World Order. Note that Muslims are participating in the US protests. Assuredly they're active in many nations. This all goes well with the Muslim doctrine, beginning with Mohammed of global dominancy via procreation, violence and rebellion. Sharia Islam is expanding globally, nation by nation, region by region and increased influence in the UN world body. This all pertains to fulfillment of the Biblical prophets regarding the end times and Armageddon. Wait. Your response to questions of whether you support shooting people in the face with gas canisters and using flashbangs on crowds of people... ...is that the protests are a Muslim conspiracy? Is anybody else here thinking Buz is dropping even farther off the deep end than normal?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
crashfrog Member (Idle past 1717 days) Posts: 19762 From: Silver Spring, MD Joined:
|
They were armed with anything they could get their hands on including stones and fire extinguishers, etc etc. All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers. According to who? The officers? I know that a recent report explains that Oakland police didn't actually use flash-bangs, that was actually "firecrackers ignited by protesters." Risible, to say the least. (No firecrackers, spent or otherwise, were recovered at the scene, though the casings of tear gas canisters and flash-bang grenades were.) But on what basis should we believe anonymous, self-serving police reports? You act like it's not the most commonplace thing in the world for police to react to peaceful, left-wing demonstrations with violence. Happens every time. Armed hooligans at a Tea Party protest? Funny, police can't be found.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rahvin Member Posts: 4061 Joined: Member Rating: 10.0 |
Being "tough on crime" sounds great to people. Putting murderers and rapists behind bars and punishing them has a certain appeal. Few people think of what is or is not appropriate for crime and punishment from the perspective of how they believe they should be treated if they were ever accused of a crime. "Criminals" are typically thought of as subhuman (and that term applies regardless of the crime committed, from stealing a pack of gum to raping a child), and they "deserve whatever they get." Nobody cares about police brutality, or prison rape, or the realities of solitary confinement, or anything wrong with out justice system because nobody ever thinks they'll have to see that side of the system themselves. So brutal cops are okay. Who cares if a cop beats the crap out of some child-raping murderer, am I right? And if police violence is okay in principle, then when someone gets beaten, they must be a criminal, they must deserve it. The Stanford Prison Experiment should be a mandatory topic of extreme focus in schools. I just noticed that Buz "jeered" this post. Out of all of the posts Buz and I have exchanged, this is the only one he's bothered to "jeer." Does this mean that Buz supports police brutality? Perhaps he thinks prison rape is a good thing?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member (Idle past 125 days) Posts: 4001 From: Adirondackia Joined: |
Buzsaw writes: Sharia Islam is expanding globally, nation by nation, region by region and increased influence in the UN world body. This all pertains to fulfillment of the Biblical prophets regarding the end times and Armageddon. Well, then that's a good thing, right? Isn't that why Israelis have such success raising funds and political support from evangelical churches? Because the existence of a militarily strong Israel coincides with their end-time beliefs? So you must welcome any spread of Islam if it heralds the Second Coming. By the way, answer my question in Message 350. Stop being the King of Jeers and give an honest reply."If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Do you have any evidence of "mobsters" or is this another one of your unsupported innuendos and assertions?
Do you have any evidence of a "radical left wing liberal atmosphere in Oakland" or is this another one of your unsupported innuendos and assertions?Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Omnivorous Member (Idle past 125 days) Posts: 4001 From: Adirondackia Joined:
|
Rahvin writes: I just noticed that Buz "jeered" this post. Out of all of the posts Buz and I have exchanged, this is the only one he's bothered to "jeer." I've noticed Buz delivers more jeers than the rest of the board combined, and dispenses them most freely when he has no effective reply. Wear it with pride
Does this mean that Buz supports police brutality? I'd say yes.
Perhaps he thinks prison rape is a good thing? The police use prison rape as an interrogation threat and put vulnerable prisoners into hard-core cell blocks and holding tanks as both punishment and leverage. I've experienced both scenarios--listening to someone who is sworn to "serve and protect" describe your likelihood of being raped with lascivious delight teaches you something about human depravity. Like most systems of institutionalized abuse, prison rape serves the institution's purposes. Buz supports his police.
{At best, slightly on topic. Shall we all try to do better? - Adminnemooseus} Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Note in red. Edited by Omnivorous, : Solidly on topic. But every day in every way, I try to do better."If you can keep your head while those around you are losing theirs, you can collect a lot of heads."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PsychMJC Member (Idle past 1552 days) Posts: 36 From: Modesto, California Joined:
|
Do you EVER.... EVER think about or do ANY research on ANY of the topics you post about? Do you EVER read, actually READ, what people take the time to put together and post here? 'Cause it REALLY doesn't seem like it.
I will gladly admit that NOT ALL of the protesters acted in an appropriate manner. Could you do the same? Fuck no you couldn't. Not a single police officer did anything wrong as far as you are concerned. But that's out of the scope of what you are commenting on anyway. This is one, specific instance I am talking about in the comment you have decided to reply to. You HAD to comment on it but you obviously couldn't be bothered to even find out what I was talking about! I have a video that CLEARLY SHOWS a visual impairment device being tossed DIRECTLY INTO a small group of people who ran to ASSIST AN INJURED PROTESTER. I can clearly see in this video not ONE SINGLE action is taken against the police by the crowd gathered before they toss the device. I can see NO weapons being pointed at the police. None. Not one. Further, I have provided the OPD Crowd Policy that SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITS the use of that kind of tactics, even IF someone, somewhere in that crowd HAD been throwing firecrackers! Where's your evidence of life threatening danger to the police? Got any? At all? Yeah, that's what I thought. Edit. I would also like to point out that Buz has tucked his tail and ran from previous comments in this thread about vacation. Nothing to say about that either, eh old chap? Edited by PsychMJC, : Edit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Adequate Member Posts: 16113 Joined:
|
The mobsters were not unarmed. They were armed with anything they could get their hands on including stones and fire extinguishers, etc etc. All kinds of dangerous stuff was being thrown at the officers. Given the radical left wing liberal atmosphere in Oakland, it must have been bad for the police and town fathers to stop the destruction violence and rebellion against law authorities. .Had it been in Iowa or Montana etc, one might expect the police to react. Had they not called in outside enforcement, likely they would've been over-run by the frenzied mobs. Do you have any evidence for your self-serving fantasies?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024