Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 61 (9209 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: The Rutificador chile
Post Volume: Total: 919,503 Year: 6,760/9,624 Month: 100/238 Week: 17/83 Day: 0/0 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum Side Orders Coffee House Occupy Wall Street

Summations Only

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Occupy Wall Street
Larni
Member (Idle past 111 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 304 of 602 (638973)
10-27-2011 10:11 AM
Reply to: Message 231 by Dr Adequate
10-20-2011 10:01 AM


I tried to read your link but I got a nose bleed.
But what happens instead is that if I suggest in the mildest tones that maybe we could try to fight against disease the same way we fought against Saddam Hussein and his imaginary WMDs, then the conservative will denounce me as an un-American Marxist. But my solution to disease is exactly the same as his solution to the imaginary WMDs --- I say, let the government do it. The only difference is that I want to tackle a real problem that actually kills Americans rather than an imaginary problem that someone made up.
I've nothing to add but, this is a really good post.
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 231 by Dr Adequate, posted 10-20-2011 10:01 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Larni
Member (Idle past 111 days)
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 307 of 602 (638979)
10-27-2011 10:51 AM
Reply to: Message 303 by jar
10-27-2011 10:06 AM


Re: vacation nad time off
So holiday is something you have to negotiate with your employer, rather than an obligation of said employer?
That's harsh: I get 35 days off, no questions asked.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 303 by jar, posted 10-27-2011 10:06 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 308 by hooah212002, posted 10-27-2011 10:58 AM Larni has not replied
 Message 309 by jar, posted 10-27-2011 11:02 AM Larni has not replied
 Message 311 by Rahvin, posted 10-27-2011 11:31 AM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024