|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 45 (9208 total) |
| |
anil dahar | |
Total: 919,510 Year: 6,767/9,624 Month: 107/238 Week: 24/83 Day: 0/3 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Why Creationists' Willful Ignorance? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3927 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: Here we go again! I said it in my native language too, clearly and with no other meaning applying. Life form groupings are 'species' of life forms with common denominators [e.g. land based]; first recording is - 'FIRST RECORDING OF IT'.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nuggin Member (Idle past 2752 days) Posts: 2965 From: Los Angeles, CA USA Joined:
|
Your frog leaping, as seen in most responses here. The issue was the first recording of life form groupings. First off, I don't own a frog. Second, we've been talking about it. You asked where life forms had been recorded prior to the Bible. I pointed out cave paintings. In response, you claimed that there should be 5 trillion aboriginies. ?!?! Then YOU brought up the fact that Egyptian heiroglyphics also demonstrate different kinds of animals and predate the bible. Fantastic. So, between the two of us, that's 2 things which predate your claim. So, that's that.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 98 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Keep trying cause you are still making no sense.
What the hell does "the first recording of life form groupings" even mean?Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3927 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Homeosaps with a NAME, date, place - followed by evidencial history of a diarised calendar are thus the non-virtual kind.
What's the oldest human NAME on record?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fearandloathing Member (Idle past 4404 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: |
Homeosaps with a NAME, date, place - followed by evidencial history of a diarised calendar are thus the non-virtual kind. WTF does this mean? Can you not speak in easy to understand English...act like you are talking to a 10 year old for me. "No sympathy for the devil; keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride...and if it occasionally gets a little heavier than what you had in mind, well...maybe chalk it off to forced conscious expansion: Tune in, freak out, get beaten." Hunter S. Thompson Ad astra per aspera Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3927 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
quote: 60K cave drawings are not life form groupings - these are just alledged 60K year old drawings; the term specie is a direct lift off from Genesis of a first recording of it with a new name. Yes, 60K and 30K humans able to perform animal drawings would number in the billions and trillions today. Not to mention mental prowess increments. Why did you not ask such questions insead of opening mouth wide and saying AAH YES PLS?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 98 days) Posts: 34140 From: Texas!! Joined:
|
Vlmki
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3927 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
Once more with feelings:
Alledged 60K humans who performed animal drawings, with no graduated imprints on the ground thereafter - are 'VIRTUAL' The listing of humans with names, writings, their ages, dod & dobs, locations, unearthed relics, etc - are the non-virtual kind.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
fearandloathing Member (Idle past 4404 days) Posts: 990 From: Burlington, NC, USA Joined: |
Your use of virtual and non-virtual is bewildering? I cant see any useful communication taking place here, it seems our use of English is far too different, thanks for trying.
"No sympathy for the devil; keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride...and if it occasionally gets a little heavier than what you had in mind, well...maybe chalk it off to forced conscious expansion: Tune in, freak out, get beaten." Hunter S. Thompson Ad astra per aspera Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nuggin Member (Idle past 2752 days) Posts: 2965 From: Los Angeles, CA USA Joined: |
60K cave drawings are not life form groupings - these are just alledged 60K year old drawings; the term specie is a direct lift off from Genesis of a first recording of it with a new name. Horses are together. Lions are together. Fish are together. Bovines are together. That's groupings. Meanwhile the term species is not a "direct lift" from Genesis, no matter how much you like to pretend. The word "species" does not appear in the Bible.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nuggin Member (Idle past 2752 days) Posts: 2965 From: Los Angeles, CA USA Joined: |
Yes, 60K and 30K humans able to perform animal drawings would number in the billions and trillions today. Not to mention mental prowess increments. Here's a "mental prowess" exercise for you. If you have 10 people on a boat, and there is food enough to keep 4 people alive for 1 month. How many of them will be alive after 1 year on the boat?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nuggin Member (Idle past 2752 days) Posts: 2965 From: Los Angeles, CA USA Joined: |
Alledged 60K humans who performed animal drawings, with no graduated imprints on the ground thereafter - are 'VIRTUAL' Alledged jews who pretend "words" represent "animals" with no actual artistic representation to prove to use what they are talking about are "VIRTUAL".
The listing of humans with names, writings, their ages, dod & dobs, locations, unearthed relics, etc - are the non-virtual kind. Yes, we are aware you have a make believe list. We could pretend to have a make believe list too, but we are adults.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
frako Member Posts: 2932 From: slovenija Joined: |
What's the oldest human NAME on record? That would be klu klu from the tu'chaka clan recorded 190 345 years ago before there was any writing, and before the hebrew god was invented. Lol writing has not been arround quite long, so my guess is 6000 years give or take.
Homeosaps with a NAME, date, place - followed by evidencial history of a diarised calendar are thus the non-virtual kind. Writing is a relatively new invention some 6000 years old Um why is this relevant i could show you some cave drawings that are over 33 000 years old, they could have been "writings" of sorts like me klu klu of threadbare tribe kill big elephant yesterday.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panda Member (Idle past 3972 days) Posts: 2688 From: UK Joined: |
IamJoseph writes:
'Homeosaps' is not a real word. Homeosaps...What language do you think you are speaking?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IamJoseph Member (Idle past 3927 days) Posts: 2822 Joined: |
This, like many such posts, say the non-creationists have lost all credibility, and has become akin to another radical fundamentalist religion.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024