Who designed the ID designer(s)?

I know I referred you all over to ID Forum to discuss ID, so this is a distinct improvement. I referred you to this particular post to as a possible place to discuss the design-designer issue.The present area of discussion is a little...ahem...post-modern, can we get a bit of focus?It certainly seems like you are all very keen to debate - and I don't want to stop you. Maybe someone wants to make some sense out of the ideas that have cropped up here and either take them elsewhere or propose a new topic?

Bertot - and anybody else too - read the admin messages that have been recently posted in this thread. Failure to do so will result in suspensions.

Message 144 provides you with some suggestions, feel free to take a look at those threads and see if the ideas you want to post about work in any of them.Unfortunately, I am not able to take your posts and move them to any of those threads...instead of copy/pasting them you might want to collate your general ideas and just post them as a new general reply in one of the suggested threads or post a new topic as you see fit.

Just so you know - I haven't deleted the contents of your last posts, if you click 'edit' or 'peek' you should still be able to see them. My impression is that A Designer Consistent with the Physical Evidence is focussing on the designer aspect. I can see that some of your points might work with the concept of that thread, but other points you raise might be off topic there.If you want to focus on

quote:

---

Basically, I would like to discuss the Intelligent Designer who would be consistent with the physical evidence available in terms of the three main qualities generally attributed to the Judeo-Christian style of God: power, intelligence and benevolence.

---

this, then go to that thread and post what you think is appropriate to this kind of discussion. Alternatively if you think that no existing topic really covers the ideas you are wanting to argue, then propose a new one.