Great Debaters

Very possibly. Anyone in mind?

I do, but I don't feel at liberty to toss someone else's name in the bucket.

---

"Why don't you call upon your God to strike me? Oh, I forgot it's because he's fake like Thor, so bite me" -Greydon Square

But Coyote, the scientific methodology of ID creationists researches evidence of the existence of a higher level of intelligence in this vast universe other than that which we earthlings experience on this tiny little speck in this vast universe called Planet Earth.You narrow minded earthling high minded elitists are like the ants of Gulliver's Travels who think your little realm of existence is the ultimate realm of all that exists, until you encountered Mr. Gulliver who opened your little ant eyes to the fact that your tiny ant hill in Mr. Gulliver's back wood lot was not all that exists.

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

How about Cavediver and ICANT, Cavediver having once been a professing evangelical Christian and ICANT, having a fairly good handle on how Evolutionists think?--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

slevesque would be better that ICANT imho

---

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
Rebel American Zen Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

---

Join the effort to solve medical problems, AIDS/HIV, Cancer and more with Team EvC! (click)

Buz - Your exclusion of participation in science threads surely doesn't extend to Great Debates does it?If not then it really has even less to do with this topic than the inevitable vaguely on/off topic banter that I hoped for.

Yes - Much better.

Fair play. I have already put Mod on the spot and am pushing others to act equally unchivalrously.But in my defense - I think the Great Debate format is a much under utilsed option here at EvC.Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.

While it is apt to compare your view of the universe to a fictional narrative, the incident you describe occurs nowhere in Gulliver's Travels. You haven't read it, have you?

Buz, you prove my point with every post.Better stick to apologetics.

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Moose

IamJoseph v. Brad McFall. On anything they chose.I'd pay for it.

I don't know how literalistic Sleve is to the Genesis account on origins. Do you?

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

quote:

---

You narrow minded earthling high minded elitists are like the ants of Gulliver's Travels who think your little realm of existence is the ultimate realm of all that exists, until you encountered Mr. Gulliver who opened your little ant eyes to the fact that your tiny ant hill in Mr. Gulliver's back wood lot was not all that exists.

---

I knew the citizens were people. I should have typed "ant size," referring to the citizens. I read it when I was a kid. Admittedly, I don't remember the setting and other particulars. Perhaps it's relevancy to my point was inadequate, Dr. Adequate. I'll re-visit the narrative, by and by. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.

Or, perhaps: lilliputian? Do you think it might have been... Lilliput?Hence the term?