Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,865 Year: 4,122/9,624 Month: 993/974 Week: 320/286 Day: 41/40 Hour: 7/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   If our sun is second or third generation, does this not conflict with Genesis ?
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3696 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 129 of 231 (626663)
07-30-2011 9:12 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by CogitoErgoSum
05-10-2011 9:34 AM


Reborn stars do not conflict with Genesis; the reverse applies [re-pro is based on a core output of the host!]. The preamble must say the universe is finite [Genesis], so the age of the universe does not change no matter how old we deem it. The other factor applicable is that light predates stars and is the first product in the universe [Genesis]; stars don't create light - they merely produce it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by CogitoErgoSum, posted 05-10-2011 9:34 AM CogitoErgoSum has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 130 by Larni, posted 07-31-2011 3:40 PM IamJoseph has replied

  
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3696 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 132 of 231 (627343)
08-02-2011 5:48 AM
Reply to: Message 130 by Larni
07-31-2011 3:40 PM


Re-generation, re-birth and geneology are not gibberish but evidenced in all biological and inanimate stuff. Welcome to the universe and planet earth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 130 by Larni, posted 07-31-2011 3:40 PM Larni has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 133 by Larni, posted 08-02-2011 8:50 AM IamJoseph has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024