Dating Question For Members

You might be able to use Thermoluminescence dating for some sands, for example relatively static dunes, sea beds, fossil dunes, but active sea side beaches are not a great prospect.AbE:Also, any TL dating would not give an age for the sand itself, but rather only when it was covered so not exposed to the sun.Edited by jar, : AbE:

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

My supposition was that that was what you meant.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Not quite.You need to understand some basics.First, in general, unless a formation has been disturbed, material above something is younger than material below something.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Did you read what I wrote?We'll go slowly until you understand the basics.Not quite.You need to understand some basics.First, in general, unless a formation has been disturbed, material above something is younger than material below something.Is that clear?

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

A catastrophe can disturb formations, and guess what, it also leaves evidence of the disturbance.It can for example, overturn a formation, or tilt a formation, but those things are also taken into consideration.BUT in the end, younger things are above older things.Even when a catastrophe creates such a formation, it is the younger material on top of older material.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

It cannot become a "Flood Thread" since there was no Biblical Flood. That is fact and anyone claiming that the Biblical Flood happened is either wrong, ignorant or lying.To make sense of geological dating you need to understand that layers are created with the oldest material on the bottom and the youngest material on the top.Even during a catastrophe that is true.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

Well first, the evidence shows with a very, very high degree of confidence that the Biblical Flood never happened. You have been given that evidence, for example in Message 28 and you have always refused to even discuss such evidence.We do know what the atmosphere was like before the dates for the imaginary Biblical Flood.We have actual samples of the atmosphere from before the date of the imaginary Biblical Flood. To keep repeating that we don't know what the atmosphere was like before the imaginary Biblical Flood just pitifully wrong.Buz, when you post nonsense that is factually wrong, where you have been shown time after time that you are factually wrong, there can be only a few explanations.You could be simply too dumb to be able to understand the explanations.You could be be crazy, delusional and in need of medical psychiatric care.Or you could be willfully ignorant, lying for Jesus, perhaps because you fear finding out that your faith is all based on lies.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

I think you are wrong.It does not matter if the intrusion was slow or fast. What is being measured is the time elapsed since the intrusion changed states from fluid to solid.And if it is above something then by definition it will be younger than material that is below unless the whole formation is disturbed and THAT will leave clear evidence of the disturbance.

---

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!