RAZD the opening message.
#1
Sorry 'moose, I had it all neat and orderly but internet explorer crashed and I can't be bothered typing it out again. (Feel free to correct).
As for RAZD, I could nominate most of his posts as examples of pure, unbiased, neutral and knowledgeable logical evaluations.
In this post, he highlights
argumentum ad ignorantiam and the neutrality of his own position.
Usually, though folk here are knowledgeable in the area of science, unlike RAZD they care more for impolite ad hominem attacks rather than putting forth logic or caring for it.
Not everyone is guilty of this, but RAZD certainly holds a position of honest logic, that doesn't favour any ideology, it seems.
Edited by mike the wiz, : No reason given.