Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,395 Year: 3,652/9,624 Month: 523/974 Week: 136/276 Day: 10/23 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Movie: "God on Trial"
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 31 of 114 (600878)
01-17-2011 3:47 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by iano
01-17-2011 3:28 PM


iano writes:
So yes, it is him killing - by doing nothing in the face of your will expressing itself. No get out of jail card there I'm afraid.
Well, there is a card for getting out of the eternal jail, yes? If I were to murder someone, and ask Jesus to forgive me, I would be forgiven yes? What if I murdered ten people? What if I murdered a hundred?
Are you seeing where I am going with this?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 3:28 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 33 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 3:57 PM Huntard has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 32 of 114 (600879)
01-17-2011 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Aware Wolf
01-17-2011 2:46 PM


Aware Wolf writes:
I've seen you use this type of language before, where you are differentiating between eternal torture and eternal separation from God. Are you saying that this separation from God isn't such a bad thing, maybe only a 6 on the discomfort scale rather than a 10? This might make God out to be less of a monster, certainly. But then that would kind of lessen the whole impact of Jesus being the Savior, since what we would be saving us from would be moderate suffering, which a lot of us are already undergoing here and now.
I'd see eternal separation from God as the framework on which eternal torment is built. For example:
When we do another wrong we can feel a sense of guilt about that wrongdoing - but the pain involved in that diminishes over time. The technical reason for this we might call "suppression of truth". In other words, without our surpressing our knowledge of wrongdoing, without our rationalising our wrongdoing away ("they deserved what they got" or "they'll get over it") we would continue to feel the pain associated with guilt.
A time will come when all our wrongdoing will be reexposed to the light. It will rise to the surface again in all its diabolical glory and we will feel the full horror of our wrongdoing. Connected to God there is forgiveness for that wrongdoing, our guilt is taken away and laid on another. Without God we must bear the weight of that ourselves.
Eternal separation from God - a place to bear the horror of your wrongdoing yourself. Without the ability to suppress. Without the ability to escape. Torment (of own manufacture).
-
If, on the other hand, this separation is real and terrible suffering, are you really saying that people knowingly and willfully, with full comprehension of the consequences, choose this over God? That seems very unlikely.
The full consequences of a choice don't need to be known in order to make a valid choice. Indeed, no one can know the full consequences of their choices before making them.
The issue isn't so much the consequence that follow, it's whether you desire righteousness or not. That's the choice that you're faced with in effect.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Aware Wolf, posted 01-17-2011 2:46 PM Aware Wolf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 35 by Aware Wolf, posted 01-17-2011 4:19 PM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 33 of 114 (600880)
01-17-2011 3:57 PM
Reply to: Message 31 by Huntard
01-17-2011 3:47 PM


Huntard writes:
Well, there is a card for getting out of the eternal jail, yes? If I were to murder someone, and ask Jesus to forgive me, I would be forgiven yes? What if I murdered ten people? What if I murdered a hundred?
Are you seeing where I am going with this?
Not quite.
Ask Jesus to forgive you for all your wrongdoing right now.
Done?
Are you forgiven? In all likelyhood not.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by Huntard, posted 01-17-2011 3:47 PM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Huntard, posted 01-17-2011 4:22 PM iano has replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 34 of 114 (600882)
01-17-2011 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 30 by iano
01-17-2011 3:28 PM


iano writes:
What would prevent you killing them except his restraining your desire to sin?
When someone goes to kill an innocent baby, god purposefully enables them to kill the child.
God takes an active part in the death of that child.
Without god's role in the event, that baby would have survived.
Your god intentionally kills innocent people. Nice.
iano writes:
No get out of jail card there I'm afraid.
No, there isn't.
Your god is an abomination that only a sociopath could worship.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 3:28 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 4:32 PM Panda has replied

  
Aware Wolf
Member (Idle past 1440 days)
Posts: 156
From: New Hampshire, USA
Joined: 02-13-2009


Message 35 of 114 (600884)
01-17-2011 4:19 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by iano
01-17-2011 3:55 PM


iano writes:
I'd see eternal separation from God as the framework on which eternal torment is built.
and in the same post
iano writes:
The issue isn't so much the consequence that follow (sic)...
I beg to differ, very very much. If eternal torment is the consequence that follows, then EVERY OTHER issue associated with the choice is so insignificant as to be effectively non-existant.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 3:55 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 39 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 4:39 PM Aware Wolf has replied

  
Huntard
Member (Idle past 2316 days)
Posts: 2870
From: Limburg, The Netherlands
Joined: 09-02-2008


Message 36 of 114 (600885)
01-17-2011 4:22 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by iano
01-17-2011 3:57 PM


iano writes:
Not quite.
Ask Jesus to forgive you for all your wrongdoing right now.
Done?
Are you forgiven? In all likelyhood not.
You can't be forgiven if you haven't done anything wrong.
But you are saying that even if you ask Jesus and god to forgive you, they won't? Then what's the point of asking? Then nobody's forgiven, then there is no "saving" to be don and therefore your religion is pointless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 3:57 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 4:34 PM Huntard has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 37 of 114 (600886)
01-17-2011 4:32 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Panda
01-17-2011 4:15 PM


Panda writes:
When someone goes to kill an innocent baby, god purposefully enables them to kill the child.
It's sin that enables them. God's restraint may prevent. That's the theology you need to deal with - not one of your own imagining
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Panda, posted 01-17-2011 4:15 PM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by Panda, posted 01-17-2011 5:17 PM iano has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 38 of 114 (600887)
01-17-2011 4:34 PM
Reply to: Message 36 by Huntard
01-17-2011 4:22 PM


Huntard writes:
You can't be forgiven if you haven't done anything wrong.
True.
But you are saying that even if you ask Jesus and god to forgive you, they won't? Then what's the point of asking? Then nobody's forgiven, then there is no "saving" to be don and therefore your religion is pointless.
Does someone saying the words "I love you" mean they love you. Or does their loving you mean they love you. Empty words are just that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by Huntard, posted 01-17-2011 4:22 PM Huntard has not replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 39 of 114 (600888)
01-17-2011 4:39 PM
Reply to: Message 35 by Aware Wolf
01-17-2011 4:19 PM


Aware Wolf writes:
I beg to differ, very very much. If eternal torment is the consequence that follows, then EVERY OTHER issue associated with the choice is so insignificant as to be effectively non-existant.
As you will. The trouble is that as a blind person (or so the theology goes) you cannot believe in the consequences that will follow in order to be motivated this way or that in your choosing. Besides, what kind of choice would it be to be presented with eternal torment or eternal bliss (although I'm sure theres some or other braveheart out there who'd be dumb enougn.. )
And so an alternative set up for choice is involved - namely your desire to be "right" or not. That's an area you can chose about, without having to believe in God's existance.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 35 by Aware Wolf, posted 01-17-2011 4:19 PM Aware Wolf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 40 by Aware Wolf, posted 01-17-2011 4:52 PM iano has replied

  
Aware Wolf
Member (Idle past 1440 days)
Posts: 156
From: New Hampshire, USA
Joined: 02-13-2009


Message 40 of 114 (600890)
01-17-2011 4:52 PM
Reply to: Message 39 by iano
01-17-2011 4:39 PM


Are you saying that God intentionally set it up so that we can't know the real consequences of our choice, because to not do so would be to make it no choice at all, the right answer being so obvious? That sounds an awful lot like deception, never mind the other obvious repercussions of that line of argument.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 39 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 4:39 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 41 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 4:55 PM Aware Wolf has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 41 of 114 (600891)
01-17-2011 4:55 PM
Reply to: Message 40 by Aware Wolf
01-17-2011 4:52 PM


Aware Wolf writes:
Are you saying that God intentionally set it up so that we can't know the real consequences of our choice, because to not do so would be to make it no choice at all, the right answer being so obvious? That sounds an awful lot like deception, never mind the other obvious repercussions of that line of argument
There is no right answer involved. The choice is yours, whichever it is is right for you.
What other repercussions are there?
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 40 by Aware Wolf, posted 01-17-2011 4:52 PM Aware Wolf has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 46 by Aware Wolf, posted 01-17-2011 8:31 PM iano has replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 42 of 114 (600894)
01-17-2011 5:17 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by iano
01-17-2011 4:32 PM


iano writes:
It's sin that enables them. God's restraint may prevent. That's the theology you need to deal with - not one of your own imagining
You said that your god is the sustainer of everything.
If he chooses not to sustain the life of an innocent child then he is enabling the murder to commit the act.
Your theology identifies your god as a mass murderer of innocent people.
These are your statements I am explaining to you.
If your god decides who lives and who dies, then he must have decided that millions of innocent people had to die.
And worse still, millions of not-so-innocent people have been killed before they had a chance to redeem themselves.
Your god says "You have sinned! But before you can truly seek forgiveness I will allow another sinner to kill you."

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 4:32 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 43 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 5:38 PM Panda has replied

  
iano
Member (Idle past 1961 days)
Posts: 6165
From: Co. Wicklow, Ireland.
Joined: 07-27-2005


Message 43 of 114 (600896)
01-17-2011 5:38 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Panda
01-17-2011 5:17 PM


Panda writes:
You said that your god is the sustainer of everything.
If he chooses not to sustain the life of an innocent child then he is enabling the murder to commit the act.
Enable :to make able; give power, means, competence, or ability to; authorize.
God not acting to prevent doesn't enable. To enable would be to make positive contribution to... Sin is what makes positive contributon to - not God.
I know it's a semantic (since without God sustaining the environment in which sin occurs there could be no sin) but it's an important distinction. It means the murderer is culpable, not God.
-
Your theology identifies your god as a mass murderer of innocent people. These are your statements I am explaining to you.
If your god decides who lives and who dies, then he must have decided
that millions of innocent people had to die.
I'm not dealing with babies/idiots in this thread (given that there's problem sufficient dealing with adults). Given that, who are you talking of as being innocent?
And worse still, millions of not-so-innocent people have been killed before they had a chance to redeem themselves. Your god says "You have sinned! But before you can truly seek forgiveness I will allow another sinner to kill you."
1) We don't know for sure who's lost and who's not in order to comment in any particular case (although I found Stalins daughters account of his last moments: struggling upright to wave his fist at the heavens just before expiring somewhat spine-tingling)
2) Basic Christian theology tells you that no one can redeem themselves no matter how long they live. All need the redemption supplied to man by God through his son, Jesus Christ. It also tells you that God wants that none should perish so we might assume that all are given sufficient chance to avail of his offer before they die.
Edited by iano, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Panda, posted 01-17-2011 5:17 PM Panda has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by Panda, posted 01-17-2011 6:46 PM iano has replied

  
Panda
Member (Idle past 3733 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 44 of 114 (600909)
01-17-2011 6:46 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by iano
01-17-2011 5:38 PM


iano writes:
Enable :to make able; give power, means, competence, or ability to; authorize.
God not acting to prevent doesn't enable. To enable would be to make positive contribution to... Sin is what makes positive contributon to - not God.
You missed a bit: Enable: 2. to make possible.
Murdering innocents is made possible by your god deciding to not intervene.
And if, as the ultimate authority, he chooses not to sustain the life of an innocent, then he is authorising their death.
Your god allows, condones, permits, helps, authorises and enables innocents to be murdered; millions of innocents.
iano writes:
I'm not dealing with babies/idiots in this thread
But I am.
The holocaust involved the deaths of many babies.
Your god wanted them to be killed - if he didn't, he would have prevented it. Or many he couldn't care less.
Is there some reason you are afraid to talk about your god killing innocents babies?
Is it because you cannot justify your god's behaviour?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 5:38 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by iano, posted 01-18-2011 4:36 AM Panda has replied

  
Granny Magda
Member
Posts: 2462
From: UK
Joined: 11-12-2007
Member Rating: 3.8


(1)
Message 45 of 114 (600916)
01-17-2011 6:59 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by iano
01-17-2011 3:23 PM


Re: Praise Be Unto His Child Murdering Glory
Again you pretend that you have no idea what I am talking about;
Turning your back on the religion of your birth doesn't make you an anti-semite. Could you be a little bit more precise - perhaps supplying some text to back up your position?
quote:
When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. I am innocent of this man’s blood, he said. It is your responsibility!
All the people answered, His blood is on us and on our children!
Matthew 27:24-25
Regardless of the Christian defences against the clear anti-Semitism in this passage (and others), it is ludicrous for you to act as though you cannot conceive why Jews would be dismissive of Christianity. The Blood Libel is perfectly sufficient reason for Jews to abominate the NT.
In the sense that God didn't create us to operate independently from him I'd have to agree with you (that we are "enslaved"). However, the argument is that we are 'we' because he breathed himself into us. Made in his image and all that. If it weren't for that there would be no "we" to speak of. We'd be down all that makes us people.
Could you deal with that omission?
God supposedly gave this gift with no conditions. We cannot be said to have agreed to any conditions or stipulations at the time of our birth. He then imposes conditions upon us after the fact. Further, he seems to have made sure that his one true route to heaven is indistinguishable from myths, campfire tales and lies.
This is not a true gift. This is not a fair contract. It is merely slavery.
I'd be careful what I wish for if I were you. If desiring his wrath being expressed at the moment it is deserved then Poof! - there goes Granny Magda (and iano).
Would you still like God to act at the moment of evildoing?
Judge yourself Iano, not me. I would have no fear of standing before any just tribunal, since I do not believe that I practice evil.
I would not place myself before judgement by your god though, because he has roved himself a moral imbecile and a cruel, vindictive monster.
Oh and by the way, how pathetic that you bring up my alleged "sins" in comparison with the fucking Holocaust! Yes, I would wish to be judged and extirpated before I went so far as to commit genocide. As it goes, I don't have any genocidal ambitions right now, but should I ever become a genocidal maniac, then yes, I would hope that God would stop me.
You're discussing with a Christian.
And you were criticising a film. If the film does not contain your preferred theology, that's just tough.
You would agree that suffering and strife focus' attention in a way that nothing else can do? It's certainly the way of this world - we desist from a desirable path when it pains us too much to continue on it. And only then.
No, that's not true. Some people are capable of desisting from a course of action because it simply isn't right. Not everyone shares the primitive and selfish attitude that you describe. Certainly I would hope that God would be above that sort of pettiness.
Suggestions? It would help if you could frame the problem first.
Pretty simple really; everyone gets what they want. The murderers and paedophiles can simply be killed, in order to protect others. Instead of hell and suffering though, they are given heaven, their own heaven. They would be unable to hurt others, but God would not need to stoop to the base practice of punitive measures.
Or, if you insist on punishment, God could make Hell a temporary sentence. He could then practice a little of what he preaches; forgiveness, a concept that seems to have been absent from previous Christian imaginings of the afterlife.
If his purposes are better served by permitting suffering then what's the issue.
He is an omnipotent, or at least awesomely powerful, deity. The fact that he apparently cannot be bothered to thin up a better way is utterly damning. The Bible exhorts his power and capabilities at great length, but he can't think of a better solution than eternal punishment for failure to adhere to a set of arbitrary and obscure rules? That simply makes no sense.
No end could justify the suffering visited upon the victims of the Holocaust. in arguing that such a thing could serve a greater good, you are lowering yourself to a state of moral debasement.
It can't be helped, such is the depth of the desire for independence from God.
You are projecting. I do not desire independence from your imaginary friends. I am already independent from that which has no sign of existing.
This boils down to a question of degree. As love > infinity so will hate (and the reaction to that which insults love). Similarily, depending on how one see's the crime, so to will one's sense of punishment be informed. There is no reason to suppose all should stop at your weighing up of things.
Again, this is no ore than an attempt to suggest that the suffering of Holocaust victims could have some higher purpose. That is a sick and despicable effort.
But then, you seem to have no problem with worshipping an evil god, whose only conception of morality is that might makes right.
GM writes:
Show me how the victims of the Holocaust receive their justice.
iano writes:
Let's not lose our context: God in the OT judging. And men finding that judgment unjust.
No, having seen the film, which you have not, I consider that the manifest lack of justice that left the inmates of concentration camps to die, is very much the context.
The men in the film are facing death at the hands of a merciless enemy. They know that God will do nothing to help them. This is the central issue. God's justice amounted to absolutely nothing. If he was real at all, he had abandoned them.
Doesn't this depend on a particular view of innocence?
If your version of innocence does not apply to those innocent children who died in the holocaust, I assure you, it's not one worth having.
The worth of my fellow human beings is best represented in the sacrifice undertaken by this self-same God on their behalf.
Another vile notion. Human beings have a worth and dignity beyond the morbid and pointless blood ritual your god feels he must go through before he can forgive us for his mistakes. Mature and genuine forgiveness is not something that comes with conditions. Christianity preaches forgiveness, but its central tenet shows that Christianity provides only a mockery of forgiveness.
Neither you nor that snippet of film (insofar as it is commandeered to condemn the biblical God) make any mention of that.
God, how dense are you? That's because the film is about Jews. To criticise it for not offering Christian theology is moronic. If the film did that, and the characters found Jesus, it would be horrifically offensive.
Mutate and Survive

On two occasions I have been asked, — "Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?" ... I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question. - Charles Babbage

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by iano, posted 01-17-2011 3:23 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by iano, posted 01-18-2011 5:25 AM Granny Magda has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024