Is there any proof of beneficial mutations?

I have searched high and low to find any evidence supporting a beneficial mutation.

Also, I have never seen any evidence of a creature gaining anything new ...

I am new to these boards, so forgive me if this has already been asked.

I have searched high and low to find any evidence supporting a beneficial mutation. All I have ever seen is mutations where it seems as though it would hinder the creature, not help it.

Also, I have never seen any evidence of a creature gaining anything new, which be required for the evolution theory. This really makes me question evolution, since it's based completely off mutations.

Xstar writes:I have searched high and low to find any evidence supporting a beneficial mutation.

Xstar writes:All I have ever seen is mutations where it seems as though it would hinder the creature, not help it.

Xstar writes:Also, I have never seen any evidence of a creature gaining anything new, which be required for the evolution theory.

Xstar writes:This really makes me question evolution, since it's based completely off mutations.

I have searched high and low to find any evidence supporting a beneficial mutation. All I have ever seen is mutations where it seems as though it would hinder the creature, not help it.

Also, I have never seen any evidence of a creature gaining anything new, which be required for the evolution theory.

This really makes me question evolution, since it's based completely off mutations.

To lift a post of my own from a different forum, where the canard of "no new information" is actually the subject of the thread, but the example is one of my favorites. I think of Hemoglobin C as sort of a "sickle-cell lite."
------------
Ref: Nature, vol 414, pp 305-308 (2001) - "Haemoglobin C protects against clinical Plasmodium falciparum malaria" , by D Modiano et al. It's not online, to my knowledge, except by paid subscription.
Normal human hemoglobin ("HbA") is coded for by DNA which reads, as the 16th through 18th positions of a certain gene, GAA. This codon tells a cell's protein factory to put the amino acid glutamate at the sixth spot along the peptide that will become the beta chain of your or my hemoglobin. However, in a large number of West Africans, particularly the Mossi of Burkina Faso, this speck of DNA reads AAA. The distribution of folks with this variant looks like a bull's-eye: lots of the gene in one area of Burkina Faso, and fewer and fewer people with it as you move away from that center. The distribution is consistent with the idea that one person had the mutation about a thousand years ago, and that it spread through his or her descendants since. (Most people weren't terribly mobile in that area until nearly modern times - at least until the slave trade started.)Now this DNA change alters that sixth amino acid on the beta chain of hemoglobin to lysine, making HbC. Most people with hemoglobin C never know it - some have mild anemia, gallstones, or spleen problems. But Modiano's paper documents that Mossi children that have both genes for HbC are 7% as likely to develop malaria as their classmates who have boring old HbA. 7% as likely to get the disease that kills a couple of million kids in West Africa every year. And that's because their genome has the information to make a protein that has one amino acid that's different from the one in their neighbors, and in their ancestors, too, if you go back a ways. New information. Useful new information. (You will agree that being able to make two different proteins is "more information" than being able to make only one, won't you? Kids in the study that had the AC genotype - that had both HbA and HbC in their blood - had a 29% reduction in their chance of getting malaria.) New, useful, "information" from a mutation.Now a footnote: if your DNA reads GUA instead of GAA in this position, you get a valine in position 6 and have sickle-cell trait - the result of a different mutated hemoglobin called HbS. This protects against malaria, too, but the side effects can be severe, including fatal, especially if you have both genes for HbS. This, too, is "new information" - a different protein is being made.

If everyone who thinks that bacteria are good examples of evolution in action, how do you explain the fact that we have studied billions upon billions of generations of bacteria, and they haven't evolved at all, they are still the same old bacteria, over and over and over again.