Your answer shoots your own arguments down. Previously you said there was instrumentation that can show us where red ends. Now you give us a range? Please also show support that this is the range where red ends. I am not likely to take yours or anyone's assertions solely on their say so.
Remember the topic is what is life and what is not life. You assert that there is a clear point where something can easily be defined as life or not life. In the color analogy you are asserting there is a point where something is red or not red. Show us that point and show us the device you claim exists that can discern this point.
Using a range completely destroys your assertions. Give us the exact point on the spectrum.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts