AlphaOmegakid writes:I guess you can’t recognize the difference between someone’s pet definition and a
scientific definition. Sad, sad, sad.
It is not up to science to provide definitions of word that arose in ordinary popular usage. That's for lexicographers to do, not for scientists to do.
One of the best definitions of "mathematics" is "that which mathematicians do". It has all of the problems that you complain about in defining life. It is, in reality, a recognition that mathematics is a broad subject, far too broad to allow precise definition.
AlphaOmegakid writes:My argument, so you understand clearly is that science does and has defined life.
Nice. Perhaps you would be so kind as to provide it.
I guess you are referring to the article (actually, an essay) that you cited and quoted from in
Message 43.
I'm sorry to be delivering the bad news, but that is not a definition of life. The author even says (in the cited article): "At that point, we all became convinced that although everyone knows what life is there is no simple definition of life."
Edited by nwr, : typo
Jesus was a liberal hippie